FWIW meinberg's chart ends up at 1.1 us with similar assumptions:
https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/specs/gpsopt.htm
you could check that your model gives similar values for the lower quality
oscillators, and longer free-run periods also?
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:32 AM BJ wrote:
> Dear fe
I should add that the numbers in the attachment are for illustrative
purposes only and are not necessarily representative of the particular
frequency reference mentioned.
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts On Behalf Of BJ
Sent: Friday, 29 November 2019 11:54
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
S
Hi,
On 2019-11-28 21:18, Joseph Gwinn wrote:
> JD,
>
> I'll have to think about it, but I will mention that with batch
> processing using window functions, it's common to precede the FFT using
> a simple FIR filter to eliminate the low-frequency energy (due to
> clutter, DC leakage/offset et al
JD,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:00:01 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com
wrote:
> Send time-nuts mailing list submissions to
> time-nuts@lists.febo.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> or
