On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 1:29 PM Anders Wallin
wrote:
> In Cs my understanding is that a transition mF=0 to mF=0 transition is used
> - so it is insensitive to the magnetic field[1].
> There is no magnetic field insensitive component of the 88Sr+ clock
> transition (other optical clocks will vary!)
In Cs my understanding is that a transition mF=0 to mF=0 transition is used
- so it is insensitive to the magnetic field[1].
There is no magnetic field insensitive component of the 88Sr+ clock
transition (other optical clocks will vary!)
See e.g. around page 10 here for an energy-level diagram:
htt
Finally received my replacement batteries and a suitable wall-wart.
After installing the batteries and initialization as per the instructions
posted to the list, it started working correctly with the original receiver.
Thanks to all who helped.
F.W.Bray
> On Nov 26, 2019, at 2:04 PM, Frederick
Hello to the group. This is great to watch and see the development of an
exotic clock. I guess I need a bit of help in understanding what I am
seeing. To a point I understand Zeeman images in respect to a cesium
reference at least. But in that case there is a single higher peak thats
the correct on
Hi Jim, yes you are right the background is a camera-image (about 30x
magnification, maybe 1um per pixel). We use a microscope-objective, a
narrow 422nm bandpass filter, then an image-intensifier, and a fairly
standard CCD camera that looks at the output of the intensifier. When
everything is work
What is HP option C89 on an HP 105B?
Thanks
Robert
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.