[time-nuts] Re: GPSDO - GPS1300-10-1000 by RFX Ltd. UK

2022-02-28 Thread paul swed
John GPSDOs fun stuff. But following your logic and I do not disagree with it. Some other GPSDO most likely will not be 10 X better unless the test one perhaps is quite poor. I am assuming better means lower noise and smaller frequency deviation. No matter its pretty hard to say if both GPSDOs are

[time-nuts] Re: GPSDO - GPS1300-10-1000 by RFX Ltd. UK

2022-02-28 Thread David C. Partridge
D. -Original Message- From: David C. Partridge Sent: 28 February 2022 13:56 To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: [time-nuts] Re: GPSDO - GPS1300-10-

[time-nuts] Re: GPSDO - GPS1300-10-1000 by RFX Ltd. UK

2022-02-28 Thread David C. Partridge
Maybe take a look at: http://www.leobodnar.com/shop/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=107&zenid=15a9 2055b16c36edbdc83f4ac8fb8abc -Original Message- From: John Moran, Scawby Design Sent: 28 February 2022 13:26 To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] GPSDO - GPS1300-10-1000 by RFX

[time-nuts] GPSDO - GPS1300-10-1000 by RFX Ltd. UK

2022-02-28 Thread John Moran, Scawby Design
With all this interesting talk about - a) How hard it was to build a GPSDO from scratch and b) How, to measure a signal accurately, you need a reference circa 10x better I started to get worried since I want to do both. To help with the latter I have acquired an HP5370A that just needs picking u