Skips data is very nice!
But speaking of dropping into the -14ths, the HP 5065A is hard to beat.
(Unless you are fortunate enough to have an 8607 option 8 sitting in your
lab!)
The Yellow trace on the attached comparison plot is my 5065A, it's a
really excellent performer and drops into the -14th
Moin Angus,
On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 22:04:54 +
Angus via time-nuts wrote:
>It's not too different from what I got with a temperature
> controlled and air pressure compensated LPRO
May I ask how you do the pressure compensation?
And could you show a phase plot of the measurement?
Our *DEV m
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:22:37 +0100, you wrote:
>So, this raises the question: why is your LPRO so much better?
>I mean, going straight down to 1e-14 is on par with the best
>research Rb standards I am aware of.
>
> Attila Kinali
It's not too different from what I got wit
Hi
Cool !!
> On Feb 10, 2021, at 6:54 PM, Skip Withrow wrote:
>
> Hello Time-Nuts,
> I just finished an almost 27 day run of one of my Rb oscillators and,
> at least, I was impressed.
>
> This oscillator is a stock standard LPRO-101 with only one slight
> modification. The 5k C-field pot was
