Re: [time-nuts] Motorola MC68HC11 Crystal

2019-03-06 Thread Roger Tilsley
Greetings Joe, Except for the difference in the marked frequency, there is no difference between the so-called "parallel resonant" and "series resonant" crystals. There is a minute difference in the physical dimensions and/or the angle of the cut(s) relative to the crystallographic axes to

Re: [time-nuts] Motorola MC68HC11 Crystal

2019-03-05 Thread Joe Leikhim
Hi Bob; Jim; After I wrote that I did take a look at RS232 serial specs and yes, they are quite permissive. The programmer I have is simply an IBM PS2/E "pizza box" which is a 486 machine running DOS. Motorola was not very competent in their design of radio service software and as such, the

Re: [time-nuts] Motorola MC68HC11 Crystal

2019-03-05 Thread Jim Harman
Async communications will usually tolerate an timing error of about 0.5 bit time in 10 bits or about 5%. So if your oscillator is within 1% (10,000 ppm) you should be OK in that regard. I suspect your serial communication problem is coming from someplace else. Maybe the radio needs real RS-232

Re: [time-nuts] Motorola MC68HC11 Crystal

2019-03-05 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi First off, the programmer will work with any of the crystals you are talking about. You should be fine at 0.1% which would be +/- 7.4 KHz relative to 7.3728 MHz. Indeed you should find that serial com will work fine at offsets even greater than this. In terms of birdies - does the radio

[time-nuts] Motorola MC68HC11 Crystal

2019-03-05 Thread Joe Leikhim
It seems some Crystal experts are on line, so here goes with my question. I have this microcomputer circuit (attached) that is in a Motorola Systems Saber radio.  It contains a 68HC11 uC that requires Y400 which is a 7.3728 MHz crystal.  Motorola no longer provides an OEM replacement for this