Hi Jason,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:39:45PM +1000, Jason Hood wrote:
> * 4- & 8-byte structs copy as int/long long (all targets);
did you check if the structure is aligned to a multiple of 4 bytes?
Otherwise it will crash on ARM.
Daniel
___
Tinycc-
Looks like a nice patch. I have some issues though.
> * 4- & 8-byte structs copy as int/long long (all targets);
> * passing structs <= 8 bytes will be treated as int/long long;
> * returning structs <= 8 bytes is done via (edx)eax (PE only);
> * added ebx to the register list (increasing prolog b
that's brillliant
2013/9/26 Jason Hood
> Greetings.
>
> It's rather funny timing that a couple of topics have come up about
> optimization and exe size, as I've just spent the past couple of weeks
> improving the generated i386 code (most of which would also apply to
> x86-64, but I've not done
Greetings.
It's rather funny timing that a couple of topics have come up about
optimization and exe size, as I've just spent the past couple of weeks
improving the generated i386 code (most of which would also apply to
x86-64, but I've not done that). Not sure what the protocol regarding
patches
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 05:31:40 +0200
> From: Sylvain BERTRAND
> To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes
> Message-ID: <20130924033140.GG754@freedom>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Wow... :) You tot
