Le dimanche 29 juin 2014, 12:32:57 大熊猫 a écrit :
Thank you Thomas, I hope you agree with my request.
Sure, as I said, provided that a testcase is added I'd be happy for you to
commit the patch.
I'll change it a warning message, and then add some tests, along with a push
up!
Great.
Not
Le dimanche 29 juin 2014, 04:56:59 YX Hao a écrit :
Hi,
Usage: tcc [options...] [-o outfile] [-c] infile(s)...
Is -l option must follow the infile(s)? Yes! I tried different positions.
Before, undefined symbol error; behind, ok. Because of I had forgotten
it. Usually, a library is
Le dimanche 01 juin 2014, 00:04:27 mobi phil a écrit :
Why tinyCC didn't use a hierarchical code review, with people who
follows the project and have a good overview (Thomas Preud'homme,
grischka, Daniel Glöckner for ARM) ?
Thanks,
I also got dizzy by those useless patches.
Le samedi 31 mai 2014, 16:27:32 David Mertens a écrit :
I have encountered this behavior before as well. I am pretty sure that the
compiler is making a guess as to the form of the function based on how it's
called. Then, it links to libc by default, so it is able to link against
those
On 2014-06-28 19:32:38 +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Le vendredi 27 juin 2014, 20:45:55 Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
I'm not sure, due to the GPL system library exception.
There is some disagreement over what that exception means. As far as
I know, it only applies if the software is usually
I have other patches, but their ideas are not very mature, and later
pushed to give you.
jiang
于 2014年06月29日 16:56, Thomas Preud'homme 写道:
Le dimanche 29 juin 2014, 12:32:57 大熊猫 a écrit :
Thank you Thomas, I hope you agree with my request.
Sure, as I said, provided that a testcase is added
Le dimanche 29 juin 2014, 12:40:04 Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
On 2014-06-28 19:32:38 +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Le vendredi 27 juin 2014, 20:45:55 Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
I'm not sure, due to the GPL system library exception.
There is some disagreement over what that exception
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Michael Matz matz@frakked.de wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Markus Bergholz wrote:
Make it clear where “mexPrintf” is defined and why it is not
effective.
mexPrintf is defined in /usr/include/octave-3.8.1/octave/mexproto.h
afaiu.
That's
Markus Bergholz wrote:
However, both end up with Mex file entry point it missing.
__declspec(dllexport) Mex file entry point
-- gr
Thanks in advanced,
Markus
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
It should yes. Grischka, Shinichiro, James: do you agree to relicense your
contributions to lib/libtcc1.c under the BSD variants in RELICENSING file?
Is not that what people listed in RELICENSING already did agree to?
If both of you answer yes, could you commit the
On 2014-06-29 23:57:08 +0200, grischka wrote:
Change the FSF header in lib/libtcc1.c? I'm not sure they would
agree. However it allows being linked into any program anyway.
How about *adding* the BSD copyright notice to this header?
i.e. any future commit should be done under these two
Hello.
I requesting memory from the stack using the function alloca.
I know that the use of it is discourage, but I want use it anyways.
I write a code for windows that use it and I tested ok, but only when I
compile with gcc. Compiling it with tiny c fails, the program crash.
Maybe is a bug of
Hello.
Currently, in the last version (from git) of tiny c, when you use the
function:
isxdigit it produce this call: isxdigit
but when you use the widechar version: iswxdigit :
iswxdigit produce this call: iswctype(d, _HEX)
Then, when you use isxdigit tiny c would be generate the call to:
13 matches
Mail list logo
