Re: [Tinycc-devel] '__builtin_frame_address' warning about suspicious use of this call

2016-11-29 Thread Christian Jullien
Ok I fixed it taking care of gcc version. http://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/ed99f3608df3d6dd4c8c7d52d608a8212203 dfe4 Looks good now on Fedora 25. C. -Original Message- From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of grischka Sent: mardi 2

Re: [Tinycc-devel] sleep() interprets argument as milliseconds instead of seconds

2016-11-29 Thread Steven G. Messervey
From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+nuke48386=yahoo@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Hernán J. González Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 2:53 PM To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [Tinycc-devel] sleep() interprets argument as milliseconds instead of seconds The POSIX sleep()

[Tinycc-devel] sleep() interprets argument as milliseconds instead of seconds

2016-11-29 Thread Hernán J . González
The POSIX sleep() function ( ) should interpret is input argument as seconds. TinyC seems to interpret it as milliseconds. Using tcc version 0.9.26 /***/ #include #include int main() { int i; fputs("Looping ...\n",stdout); for(i=0;i<10;i++) { fputs(".",stdo

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Problem with libtcc DLL + MEMORY output

2016-11-29 Thread Amaury Bouchard
Indeed, I missed this information. Thank you for your help. Well, I found some documentation where the tcc_set_output_type() function was called after compilation, and it work fine like that, so I didn't wonder that TCC was not able to do both outputs with a single compilation. The question about w

Re: [Tinycc-devel] '__builtin_frame_address' warning about suspicious use of this call

2016-11-29 Thread grischka
Christian Jullien wrote: GCC documentation says: Calling this function with a nonzero argument can have unpredictable effects, including crashing the calling program. As a result, calls that are considered unsafe are diagnosed when the -Wframe-address option is in effect. Such calls should onl