Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
On December 11, 2016 9:26:03 AM GMT+00:00, Christian Jullien
wrote:
I think it's time to think about 0.9.27.
I also think so but I'd prefer to discuss the version separately to get it
changed quickly. A release will take more time.
Well, how much more time? That
> Aarch64? What machine do you have?
He he! Same as yours
gcc113 500GB 8x2.4 GHz aarch64 / 32 GB RAM / APM X-Gene Mustang
board / Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS
gcc114 500GB 8x2.4 GHz aarch64 / 32 GB RAM / APM X-Gene Mustang
board / Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS
gcc115 500GB 8x2.4 GHz aarc
On December 11, 2016 9:26:03 AM GMT+00:00, Christian Jullien
wrote:
>I think it's time to think about 0.9.27.
I also think so but I'd prefer to discuss the version separately to get it
changed quickly. A release will take more time.
>
>As said many time, I'm ready to test/qualify on:
>- win32/
I think it's time to think about 0.9.27.
As said many time, I'm ready to test/qualify on:
- win32/win64
- linux x86/x86_64 multiarch
- ARM (RPi)
- Aarch64
With standard tcc tests and my own tests before official release.
C.
-Original Message-
From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bou
Hi there,
When packaging development version of tinycc, tcc -v reports 0.9.26 which
becomes more and more misleading as time passes. How about renaming the
version to 0.9.27 (devel) or a similar naming? It might also tempt more people
into trying tinycc?
In the same spirit, is there any object
