C'mon, you cannot put a bunch of #defines under a license. Just use
whatever header file has the proper defines.
On Fri, 6 May 2022 18:59:51 +0200 Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
wrote:
> I found another dwarf.h. Is this version OK? (See attachment)
>
> Herman
>
>
> On 5/6/22 17:28, Br
I found another dwarf.h. Is this version OK? (See attachment)
Herman
On 5/6/22 17:28, Brian Callahan wrote:
An FYI for packagers: dwarf.h is dual-licensed LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+. This
is different than the rest of tcc which is LGPLv2+.
~Brian
On 5/5/2022 5:13 AM, Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-
An FYI for packagers: dwarf.h is dual-licensed LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+. This
is different than the rest of tcc which is LGPLv2+.
~Brian
On 5/5/2022 5:13 AM, Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel wrote:
> The new gcc12 release does not support stabs any more.
> This was a good reason to add support for dwa
Hey,
On Fri, 6 May 2022, Raul Hernandez wrote:
It would seem better to canonicalize during generating this, because
the above and this don't look equivalent anyway (they are equivalent
only when the above relative path is less that seven levels deep from
/).
In our case this isn’t an issue,
Hi,
> It would seem better to canonicalize during generating this, because the
> above and this don't look equivalent anyway (they are equivalent only when
> the above relative path is less that seven levels deep from /).
In our case this isn’t an issue, since the .c file is always compiled un
