Hello, everyone.
I have finally got around to having a shot at implementing C23's "#embed"
directive. However, I am struggling to think of the best way to let the user
specify embed paths. The standard proposal
(https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3017.htm#design-familiar-paths)
I'd like to take a look at it, but only if there aren't any other takers; I
have loads of exams coming up in the next few months so implementing it might
take me a while.
-- certanan
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, April 20th, 2023 at 10:21 AM, Thiago Adams
wrote:
> C23 _has_e
cide.
One way or another, implementing an error message pointing users in the right
direction instead of the generic "invalid option" error would do no harm, or
would it?
- certanan
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, April 18th, 2023 at 8:37 AM, grischka wrote:
> On 18.
I couldn't find any specific reasons as to why '--' was replaced by '-run'
(other than '-run' being implicitly more coherent than '--'). Since there is a
possibility that older scripts still depend on '--', would it be a bad idea to
re-implement it for the sake of backward compatibility, and sta
I understand. But then what role does the flag fulfil in this script?
https://github.com/qemacs/qemacs/blob/master/qe.tcc
- certanan
> I tried: gcc -- a.c
> and got:
> gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '--'
>
> This is with prerelease of gcc 13.
> So gcc does not support this. Why wou
essage ---
On Sunday, April 16th, 2023 at 5:46 PM, grischka wrote:
> On 15.04.2023 22:38, certanan via Tinycc-devel wrote:
>
> > From what it seems to me, even Bellard's QEmacs seems to be relying on
> > this, rather, standard feature since at least 19 years ago, as
From what it seems to me, even Bellard's QEmacs seems to be relying on this,
rather, standard feature since at least 19 years ago, as referenced in its
official GitHub repository.
Am I missing something cardinal, or is there, indeed, no valid reason for this
seemingly not being implemented in tc
That was helpful; thanks.
I will use the mob branch then.
- certanan
--- Original Message ---
On Saturday, April 8th, 2023 at 5:16 AM, Ziyao via Tinycc-devel
wrote:
> On 2023-04-06 21:05, certanan via Tinycc-devel wrote:
>
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > I
Hello, everyone.
I am thinking of having a shot at porting tcc to the AVR microcontroller
family, as an alternative to a part of the bulky GNU toolchain.
Since the last release was specified quite a while back, I am inclined to fork
at HEAD. However when it comes to 'mob' branches, I am always a
I did, actually, implement the very same fix. I was, solely, afraid of pushing
it in case it was a feature and I missed something cardinal.
Thanks.
R
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, March 9th, 2023 at 3:02 PM, Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
wrote:
> On 3/9/23 08:53, certanan
Binaries do not get built - and are omitted from the installation process, in
turn - when running 'make install' before 'make'. Is this a feature, or a bug?
Thanks.
RT___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman
11 matches
Mail list logo
