In mainstream? As an extension?
I would really prefer to not have such support..and in case, just think on
object-oriented extensions, but not c++.
--pancake
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
You can also use radare or radare2. But source level is not very well
supported, just addr2line.
On Apr 18, 2010, at 10:28 AM, grischka wrote:
Alexei wrote:
Which debuggers work with TCC executables? I mean source level
debugging.
Thanks
GDB (or any debugger that understands stabs) shou
I would propose an even funnier question: how many tcc devs are not in this
mailing?
Seriously. Which is the real question hidden in your sentence?
- Original message -
> hello tcc devlopers :)
>
> How many tcc developers are in this mailing list?
>
> (.<.)--Prestin
this code doesnt compiles with gcc ,the bug is because tcc allows to
compile such expressions?
can you explain it better?
a.c: In function ‘main’:
a.c:8: warning: format ‘%X’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2
has type ‘int *’
a.c:8: warning: format ‘%X’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, b
Check http://live.gnome.org/Vala too
i think it works fine with tinicc
Míguel wrote:
Hi, Jerome!
Very interesting! I've been taking a look at the documentation and it
seems to be similar to what I had in mind.
I will take a deeper look at it.
Thanks for the information!
--
I have spotted some issues in the configure script.
- Some undocumented configure flags
--cpu = { .. }
not all handled architectures by the configure script are
supported by the compiler
-> needs to cleanup
--enable-cross
fails to build the mingw32 compiler in lin
reat if somebody can take a look on these bugs.
Thanks
[1] http://hg.youterm.com/rcc
--pancake
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
It's dangerous to push bins in virustotal that you know that are not
virus because their heuristics makes they think that your bin that has
been uploaded 100 doesn't looks like a virus but it can probably be
one of them.
When this happens, the antivirus companies get those signatures and a
You can try uploading the bins to www.virustotal.com to get a report
from mostly all current AV.
Are those bins uploaded somewhere? I know ppl from some av companies
and they can review it. Signature based detection is a deprecated
technique..but it's still used :(
On Jun 12, 2009, at 8:2
Would be good to send the changelog together with the release announce
email.
Congratulations for the release :)
On May 11, 2009, at 7:18 PM, grischka wrote:
I have put together a release candidate for 0.9.25:
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git
which I plan to upload at savannah in a week
them are >1 byte bigger and there
are some new
opcodes like the "syscall" one. But a basic port should be fast do
implement.
Thanks for such a great work!
--pancake
grischka wrote:
shinichiro.h wrote:
Hi,
I like this idea. But unfortunately, this needs some fixes for
x86-
I have proposed TCC as a project to be developed this summer
into the google summer of code of this year under the umbrella
of the suckless project.
http://www.suckless.org/GSoC2009
People interested contact me or g...@suckless.org
Here's the text:
"""
Improve tcc
We'd like to see tcc
There are plans to support alloca() in tcc?
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
