[Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Bug#698351: tcc: FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered)

2013-01-17 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Hi there, I've just received this bug report in Debian. I don't know about this flag but if even gcc does the mistake, I think we can safely delay the fix for after the release, unless it's an easy fix. The bug report suggest there is just an instruction to change and that could be done easily

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Bug#698351: tcc: FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered)

2013-01-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, On 2013-01-17 15:57:50 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > I've just received this bug report in Debian. I don't know about > this flag but if even gcc does the mistake, I think we can safely > delay the fix for after the release, unless it's an easy fix. The > bug report suggest there is just

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Bug#698351: tcc: FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered)

2014-01-02 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le jeudi 17 janvier 2013, 16:18:04 Vincent Lefevre a écrit : > Hi, Hi Vincent, > > I've quickly looked at the source, but I'm not sure (I know almost > nothing about x86 / x86_64). One important point is that the > FE_INVALID flag must not be set for == and !=, and it seems that > the current co

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Bug#698351: tcc: FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered)

2014-01-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi Thomas, On 2014-01-03 10:30:15 +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > There is quite a few differences in the output about -0.0 where gcc > uses 0.0. > I'm not sure it's worth doing anything to change that since it's not > a bug but less divergence with gcc (and probably clang) could be > good. If

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Bug#698351: tcc: FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered)

2014-01-02 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le vendredi 3 janvier 2014, 04:54:57 Vincent Lefevre a écrit : > Hi Thomas, > > On 2014-01-03 10:30:15 +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > There is quite a few differences in the output about -0.0 where gcc > > uses 0.0. > > I'm not sure it's worth doing anything to change that since it's not > >

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Bug#698351: tcc: FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered)

2014-01-04 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le vendredi 3 janvier 2014, 13:28:13 Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : > Le vendredi 3 janvier 2014, 04:54:57 Vincent Lefevre a écrit : > > Hi Thomas, > > > > On 2014-01-03 10:30:15 +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > > There is quite a few differences in the output about -0.0 where gcc > > > uses 0.0

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Bug#698351: tcc: FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered)

2014-01-04 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2014-01-04 20:59:18 +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > By the way, would you agree to put your test code under the MIT license > as tcc? It would be a nice addition to tcc's test suite. Yes, the MIT license is fine for me. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible va

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Bug#698351: tcc: FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered)

2014-01-05 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le samedi 4 janvier 2014, 15:35:17 Vincent Lefevre a écrit : > On 2014-01-04 20:59:18 +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > By the way, would you agree to put your test code under the MIT license > > as tcc? It would be a nice addition to tcc's test suite. > > Yes, the MIT license is fine for me.