Hi,
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, ra...@airmail.cc wrote:
Thank you very much! Where may I find this patch? It has yet not shown
up on http://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/tree
Ahem. I forgot to push the changes, they are there now.
Ciao,
Michael.
___
Tinycc-deve
On 2018-04-06 22:05, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, ra...@airmail.cc wrote:
I tried modifying my test program to use __attribute instead, in that
case the code line 3345: case TOK_ALIGNED2: is being executed which is
good. but again the output is not zeros. Perhaps a.aligned is b
Hi,
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, ra...@airmail.cc wrote:
I tried modifying my test program to use __attribute instead, in that
case the code line 3345: case TOK_ALIGNED2: is being executed which is
good. but again the output is not zeros. Perhaps a.aligned is being
ignored for functions during codegen
On 2018-04-06 20:13, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, ra...@airmail.cc wrote:
I made this test program which I expect to print all 0's, but it
doesn't.
I noticed that after tcc -E the attributes have all disappeared.
Any idea what is stopping this from working? the attribute is
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, ra...@airmail.cc wrote:
I made this test program which I expect to print all 0's, but it
doesn't.
I noticed that after tcc -E the attributes have all disappeared.
Any idea what is stopping this from working? the attribute is documented
and code gen seems to respect T
Hello!
I made this test program which I expect to print all 0's, but it
doesn't.
I noticed that after tcc -E the attributes have all disappeared.
Any idea what is stopping this from working? the attribute is documented
and code gen seems to respect TOK_ALIGNED. I wasn't able to understand
h