On 04/04/14 16:59, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hello Ramsay,
>
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>> After commit ea2805f ("shared libs: Build libtcc1.a with -fPIC", 02-04-2014),
>> this now fails like so:
>
> Fixed with 2024c445. Indeed PIC input wasn't handled correctly in
> connection wi
Hello Ramsay,
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> After commit ea2805f ("shared libs: Build libtcc1.a with -fPIC", 02-04-2014),
> this now fails like so:
Fixed with 2024c445. Indeed PIC input wasn't handled correctly in
connection with -run (emitting a real ELF executable worked). So th
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
I propose to remove bounds check from tests/build till we have a good
solution/implementation to it.
Why should we? The checks are for features that are supposed to work.
They did work once. They don't anymore. That's a regression. And
Indeed I did so on my repository
https://github.com/mingodad/tinycc/commit/74840e25b5d2bde099dbd3e7088cfef49bb172ce
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte
wrote:
> I propose to remove bounds check from tests/build till we have a good
> solution/implementation to it.
>
>
> On Thu,
I propose to remove bounds check from tests/build till we have a good
solution/implementation to it.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> tcc on i386 has been failing a couple of tests for a while.
> For example, commit 3e56584 ("Allow local redefinition of enume