Yep,
Actually TOS_NODE_ID was set, but ActiveMessageAddress did not which led to all
this
trouble...
Thanks,
Y.
Philip Levis wrote:
>
> On Jun 10, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Yiannis Yiakoumis wrote:
>
>>
>> If I interpret the packet correct (ID=0x18, 2 bytes for LinkEstimator,
>> 1 byte option, 2
>
On Jun 10, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Yiannis Yiakoumis wrote:
>
> If I interpret the packet correct (ID=0x18, 2 bytes for
> LinkEstimator, 1 byte option, 2
> bytes parent,...) micaz root sends the packet with the wrong parent
> (0001).
>
> (I use set-mote-id in Mirage in order to set the id (after e
It seems that something else is going on...
This is the output, after a fresh restart and/or address filtering ( I did this
through
-DCC2420_NO_ADDRESS_RECOGNITION, is this correct? ).
In both cases root node has id 500.
If I interpret the packet correct (ID=0x18, 2 bytes for LinkEstima
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Yiannis Yiakoumis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I will and let you know when I have any news.
>
> By the way, is address filtering platform specific, or something that could
> work on telosb and not in micaz?
It should work on both the platforms but I suspect t
OK, I will and let you know when I have any news.
By the way, is address filtering platform specific, or something that could
work on telosb
and not in micaz?
Y.
Omprakash Gnawali wrote:
> I remember having a similar problem and I got CTP to work only after
> disabling address filtering. Then
I remember having a similar problem and I got CTP to work only after
disabling address filtering. Then I just used a fresh and clean tree
and it was working again. So, can you try a clean tree? If that does
not work, can you try disabling address filtering just so that we know
if the symptom you re
Wanted to say that 141 is the root with ID 500, and 143 the other node with ID
2. (142
still being the BaseStation)..
Sorry about that,
Y.
Yiannis Yiakoumis wrote:
> Om,
>
> Here is the setup: Two micaz nodes, 143 is the root with ID 500, 141 is the
> other node.
> 142 is a basestation close
Om,
Here is the setup: Two micaz nodes, 143 is the root with ID 500, 141 is the
other node.
142 is a basestation close there...
Thanks,
Yiannis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] BaseNetwork]$ java -classpath tinyos.jar
net.tinyos.tools.Listen -comm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:10002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:10002: resynch
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Yiannis Yiakoumis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I run into problems using ctp in micaz.
> I use TestNetwork application installed in micaz. Root node seems to work ok,
> sending
> beacons with itself as parent and etx=0. But the receivers even though the
Hi all,
I run into problems using ctp in micaz.
I use TestNetwork application installed in micaz. Root node seems to work ok,
sending
beacons with itself as parent and etx=0. But the receivers even though they get
this
beacon ( I have gone until insertNeighbor() which returns SUCCESS),they wil
10 matches
Mail list logo
