I found lesson9 and lesson10 in the website of
http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/tutorial/.
My tinyOS is 1.18. I am afraid that is a tutorials for tinyos2.0.
Whatever it is helpful.
As Philip said I found the part of .platform file, but I can not found
the other part. What is the file nam
I'm not sure which part you say you've found...
In my T1 I don't find a tos/chips/... directory
and thus no ".platform" file, at least if I
understood the implications of phil's message.
On the other hand, you can find ncc with "type ncc"
in /usr/local/bin/ncc . It is a perl file and
searching f
Oh, now I see...my doc/tutorial -- T1 -- directories only
go up to lesson8.html...silly me. What'd I miss in lesson9 too?
Does the advice below apply to T1 as well?
thanks
MS
Philip Levis wrote:
On Nov 9, 2006, at 12:16 PM, Michael Schippling wrote:
Yes, wouldn't we all like to know that...
On Nov 9, 2006, at 12:16 PM, Michael Schippling wrote:
Yes, wouldn't we all like to know that...
I just asked Phil if it was doc'ed someplace.
I'd suspect that it's defined in the nesc scripts
but I never went to look...
There are two parts. The first is the default TinyOS part. This is in
On 11/9/06, Michael Schippling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Philip Levis wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2006, at 5:51 PM, Michael Schippling wrote:
>
>> It's not "duplication", it's overloading...
>> I haven't done an exhaustive search, but each of
>> the same-named files/modules has different behavior --
>>
Philip Levis wrote:
On Nov 8, 2006, at 5:51 PM, Michael Schippling wrote:
It's not "duplication", it's overloading...
I haven't done an exhaustive search, but each of
the same-named files/modules has different behavior --
mostly due to platform or protocol differences.
Care to re-invent C++
Yes, wouldn't we all like to know that...
I just asked Phil if it was doc'ed someplace.
I'd suspect that it's defined in the nesc scripts
but I never went to look...
MS
Hairong Yan wrote:
Dear Michael Schippling,
Very thanks for reply. I am afraid I have not clear the question.
My question is
Dear Michael Schippling,
Very thanks for reply. I am afraid I have not clear the question.
My question is where the include order defined? I know them after make,
but I want to know before make.
Best regards!
hairong yan
>>> Michael Schippling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-11-08 19:47 >>>
There is an
On Nov 8, 2006, at 5:51 PM, Michael Schippling wrote:
It's not "duplication", it's overloading...
I haven't done an exhaustive search, but each of
the same-named files/modules has different behavior --
mostly due to platform or protocol differences.
Care to re-invent C++ using directories inste
It's not "duplication", it's overloading...
I haven't done an exhaustive search, but each of
the same-named files/modules has different behavior --
mostly due to platform or protocol differences.
Care to re-invent C++ using directories instead of name-spaces?
sorry, my bad...
MS
Benjamin Mador
There does seem (to me) to be a lot of unnecessary duplication throughout the
tree. I seem to run accross it whenever I search for things.
--
For some reason, the United States is the only country on Earth where
accidents don't happen it's always somebody's fault, and you can sue that
somebody
There is an assumed include order defined _somewhere_ in the tool chain.
You can add a -v to the nesc line to get a list of source files (but not
necessarily header files unfortunately). Or you can search through the
intermediate output app.c file. The make docs output will also show
which modules
Dear Sir,
I am reading the codes of CntToLedsAndRfm, I notes there are two
components named RadioCRCPacket, one is in the directory of system, one
is in the platform. The compiler choose the one in the platform
directory.
But in the makefile I can not found any rule of it, why?
Thanks in advance.
b
13 matches
Mail list logo
