any remaining valid packets out?
-David
-Original Message-
From: Liusand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 10:33 PM
To: David Moss; tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] TXFIFO underflow not taken care of in TinyOS
2.0.2?
Thanks, David.
I
Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 10:21 AM
To: 'Liusand' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: [Tinyos-help] TXFIFO underflow not taken care of in TinyOS
2.0.2?
Hi Sha -
You're right, we are missing a check for RXFIFO overflow. Right now
increases
the throughput.
-David
-Original Message-
From: Liusand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:08 AM
To: David Moss; tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] TXFIFO underflow not taken care of in TinyOS
2.0.2?
Hi David,
Thanks
The TX FIFO is preloaded with data. The data is not being transmitted to
the CC2420 as the transmission is taking place, unlike other chips. Because
of the preload, it is impossible for the CC2420 to produce a TXFIFO
UNDERFLOW. All the data to send is available on the chip when transmit
occurs.
,
-Sha
--
From: David Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 5:26 PM
To: 'Liusand' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: [Tinyos-help] TXFIFO underflow not taken care of in TinyOS
2.0.2?
The TX FIFO
