Hi Florian:
Changes look pretty good to me.
I'd also recommend deferring the call to k_init_timer() to the same
point as your list_add_tail() call. (If you don't, then there should
really be a k_term_timer() call in the clean up code that handles a
failure of tipc_node_attach_link().)
Regards,
if printbuf allocation or tipc_node_attach_link() fails, invalid
references to the link are left in the associated node and bearer
structures.
Fix by doing printbuf allocation early and adding the new link
to b_ptr->links after tipc_node_attach_link() succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <[E
Jon, My thoughts are inline below prefixed by [PHANI], Rgds, Phani
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Paul Maloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 6:51 PM
> To: Marella P-G19460
> Cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; Betham R-G19443;
> Vishal Soni-G20083; Redd
The next meeting of the TIPC Working Group is scheduled for Thursday,
July 26th, 2007 at 11 AM EDT.
(Please convert to your local time zone.)
PROPOSED AGENDA:
Brainstorming on approaches to provide control/data plane separation in
a TIPC network. (Several companies have expressed interest in see
