Yes, this looks ok.
Reviewed-by: me
On 08/17/2016 09:42 AM, Richard Alpe wrote:
> Add TIPC_NL_PEER_REMOVE netlink command. This command can remove
> an offline peer node from the internal data structures.
>
> This will be supported by the tipc user space tool in iproute2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rich
Add TIPC_NL_PEER_REMOVE netlink command. This command can remove
an offline peer node from the internal data structures.
This will be supported by the tipc user space tool in iproute2.
Signed-off-by: Richard Alpe
Reviewed-by: Jon Maloy
Acked-by: Ying Xue
---
include/uapi/linux/tipc_netlink.h
Hi Richard,
Almost. Fix the issues I mention below, and it should be ok.
///jon
On 08/17/2016 07:21 AM, Richard Alpe wrote:
> Add TIPC_NL_PEER_REMOVE netlink command. This command can remove
> an offline peer node from the internal data structures.
>
> This will be supported by the tipc user sp
Add TIPC_NL_PEER_REMOVE netlink command. This command can remove
an offline peer node from the internal data structures.
This will be supported by the tipc user space tool in iproute2.
Signed-off-by: Richard Alpe
Reviewed-by: Jon Maloy
Acked-by: Ying Xue
---
include/uapi/linux/tipc_netlink.h
I have found the following issue after the series is applied to the latest
kernel:
Test # 8
TIPC TIPC_IMPORTANCE test...STARTED!
TEST FAILED unexpected number of send() errors errno = 113: No route to host
Test # 1
Below is the procedure of how to reproduce above error:
Prepare for two nodes. On
In the final code, it's found there is the following code:
static bool filter_connect(struct tipc_sock *tsk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct sock *sk = &tsk->sk;
struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
struct tipc_msg *hdr = buf_msg(skb);
if (unlikely(msg_mcast(hdr)))
Hi Erik,
Thanks for the patches. They are merged and is tagged with version v2.2.0.
https://sourceforge.net/p/tipc/tipcutils/ci/dc8c2d324cda2e80a6e07ee1998fca0839d4a721/
regards partha
On 08/15/2016 10:23 PM, Jon Maloy wrote:
> If Erik doesn't have access to the tipcutils repository I suggest o
The name of tipc_set_state() is too general, so it's better to change it as:
tipc_set_sk_state()
Regards,
Ying
-Original Message-
From: Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan [mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 5:19 PM
To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net;
