Re: [tipc-discussion] [PATCH net-next v3 00/12] tipc: create socket FSM using sk_state only

2016-09-15 Thread Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan
On 09/14/2016 10:20 PM, Jon Maloy wrote: > Hi Partha, > It looks good. I am especially happy that you got rid of the "connected" > field, which I have been requesting for several years. > I only have a couple of comments: > > 1: It disturbs me that TIPC_UNCONNECTED and TIPC_LISTENING sockets go

Re: [tipc-discussion] [PATCH net-next v3 00/12] tipc: create socket FSM using sk_state only

2016-09-15 Thread Jon Maloy
On 09/15/2016 08:29 AM, Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan wrote: > > On 09/14/2016 10:20 PM, Jon Maloy wrote: >> Hi Partha, >> It looks good. I am especially happy that you got rid of the "connected" >> field, which I have been requesting for several years. >> I only have a couple of comments: >> >> 1: I

Re: [tipc-discussion] [PATCH net-next v3 00/12] tipc: create socket FSM using sk_state only

2016-09-15 Thread Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan
On 09/15/2016 02:39 PM, Jon Maloy wrote: > > > On 09/15/2016 08:29 AM, Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan wrote: >> >> On 09/14/2016 10:20 PM, Jon Maloy wrote: >>> Hi Partha, >>> It looks good. I am especially happy that you got rid of the "connected" >>> field, which I have been requesting for several years

Re: [tipc-discussion] [PATCH net-next v3 00/12] tipc: create socket FSM using sk_state only

2016-09-15 Thread Jon Maloy
> -Original Message- > From: Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan > Sent: Thursday, 15 September, 2016 08:55 > To: Jon Maloy ; Jon Maloy ; > tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; Ying Xue > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/12] tipc: create socket FSM using sk_state > only > > On 09/15/2016 02:39