[tipc-discussion] tipc: fix socket timer deadlock

2016-06-13 Thread GUNA
Hi Jon, Please let me know where I could get the patch for this fix. Thanks, Guna -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps

[tipc-discussion] tipc: name table entry is not matched

2016-06-01 Thread GUNA
I am running on Kernel 4.4.0 and do see table Name table mismatch as per "tipc-config" tool. As per analysis, I do see only one entry is mismatched as indicated below. It is seen only on card13 CPU and no other CPUs (system has total 10 cards). The system is up 22 days. Type Lower

Re: [tipc-discussion] tipc_sk_rcv: Kernel panic on one of the card on 4.4.0

2016-05-31 Thread GUNA
;tipc: block BH in TCP callbacks" could resolve the issue then I could try applying the patch. However the issue is not reproducible. So, we may not get the result right away. Which Erik's patch you are talking about? Is this one, "tipc: fix timer handling when socket is owned" ?

[tipc-discussion] tipc_sk_rcv: Kernel panic on one of the card on 4.4.0

2016-05-24 Thread GUNA
lock_sock/release_sock use in tipc_sk_timeout() fix the issue ? Thanks, Guna -- Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM

Re: [tipc-discussion] tipc_sk_rcv: Kernel panic on one of the card on 4.4.0

2016-05-20 Thread GUNA
Thanks Erik for your quick analysis. If it is not known issue, are there any expert available to investigate it further why this lockup happen? Otherwise let me know the patch or fix information. // Guna On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Erik Hugne <erik.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > A li

Re: [tipc-discussion] tipc_sk_rcv: Kernel panic on one of the card on 4.4.0

2016-05-19 Thread GUNA
6 at 10:34:05AM -0400, GUNA wrote: >> One of the card in my system is dead and rebooted to recover it. >> The system is running on Kernel 4.4.0 + some latest TIPC patches. >> Your earliest feedback of the issue is recommended. >> > At first i thought this might

[tipc-discussion] tipc_sk_rcv: Kernel panic on one of the card on 4.4.0

2016-05-19 Thread GUNA
One of the card in my system is dead and rebooted to recover it. The system is running on Kernel 4.4.0 + some latest TIPC patches. Your earliest feedback of the issue is recommended. The cascaded failure logs are following: [686797.257405] Modules linked in: nf_log_ipv4 nf_log_common xt_LOG

Re: [tipc-discussion] Tipc: name table mismatch between different cards in a system

2016-05-04 Thread GUNA
1). When I run tipc-config (which is deprecated in the new version), I see the wrong value key == portid for the same publications! " // Guna On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:22 PM, GUNA <gbala...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any possibility getting the fix soon? Our audit scripts cause &

Re: [tipc-discussion] tipc: tipc_recv_stream with kernel panic

2016-05-03 Thread GUNA
agree with Erik too. > > > > The oops should be caused by socket was freed early. But > > > > GUNA, can you reproduce the issue? If so, please try to revert the commit > f4195d1eac954a67adf112dd53404560cc55b942 (“tipc: avoid packets leaking on > socket rec

[tipc-discussion] tipc: tipc_recv_stream with kernel panic

2016-05-02 Thread GUNA
The following TIPC traces were collected after cards were forced to reboot to recover them. Kernel: 4.4.0 is running and applied some latest TIPC patches. [ 65.954959] sm-msp-queue[1279]: unable to qualify my own domain name (dcsx5testslot3) -- using short name [ 632.098785] perf interrupt

[tipc-discussion] tipc utility: No tipc binary in iproute2

2016-04-29 Thread GUNA
directory `/root/iproute2-4.4.0/tipc' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/iproute2-4.4.0/tipc' make[1]: Entering directory `/root/iproute2-4.4.0/man' Am I missing any? Thank you, Guna -- Fi

Re: [tipc-discussion] Tipc: name table mismatch between different cards in a system

2016-04-29 Thread GUNA
Thank you Jon. Richard, could you let me know the fix for this please. thanks, Guna On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jon Maloy <jon.ma...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: GUNA [mailto:gbala...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, 29 Apri

Re: [tipc-discussion] [PATCH net-next 1/1] tipc: set 'active' state correctly for first established link

2016-04-29 Thread GUNA
I have tested this fix and both links with same priority now are ACTIVE state instead of one STANDBY. Thanks Jon. On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:21 PM, GUNA <gbala...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Jon. I will try it tomorrow. > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2016, Jon Maloy <ma.

Re: [tipc-discussion] Tipc: name table mismatch between different cards in a system

2016-04-28 Thread GUNA
sg.h" > > /* IANA assigned UDP port */ > > #define UDP_PORT_DEFAULT 6118 > > @@ -221,10 +220,6 @@ static int tipc_udp_recv(struct sock *sk, struct > sk_buff *skb) > > { > > struct udp_bearer *ub; > > struct tipc_bearer *b; > > -

Re: [tipc-discussion] Kernel 4.4.0 TIPC: links were bouncing and not stable enough

2016-04-28 Thread GUNA
Thanks Jon. Please see inline On Thursday, April 28, 2016, Jon Maloy <jon.ma...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Guna, > see below. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: GUNA [mailto:gbala...@gmail.com <javascript:;>] > > Sent: Thursday, 28

Re: [tipc-discussion] Tipc: name table mismatch between different cards in a system

2016-04-28 Thread GUNA
See inline On Thursday, April 28, 2016, Jon Maloy <jon.ma...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: GUNA [mailto:gbala...@gmail.com <javascript:;>] > > Sent: Thursday, 28 April, 2016 17:43 > > To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourcef

[tipc-discussion] Tipc: name table mismatch between different cards in a system

2016-04-28 Thread GUNA
VE MTU:1500 Priority:10 Tolerance:1200 ms Window:50 packets // CPU Link <1.1.2:p19p1-1.1.10:eth0> ACTIVE MTU:1500 Priority:10 Tolerance:1200 ms Window:50 packets Link <1.1.2:p19p2-1.1.10:eth1> STANDBY MTU:1500

[tipc-discussion] Kernel 4.4.0 TIPC: links were bouncing and not stable enough

2016-04-28 Thread GUNA
ou asked me to turn on debug from the node.c. Could you let me know how I could turned on? Do I need to add printf or just enable any micro? I tried to use the latest tipcutils, but having issue on compiling it. Thanks, Guna

[tipc-discussion] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [kwork er/u32:2:19149]

2016-04-11 Thread GUNA
Lots of TIPC traces seen since it is started until the card reboots... Apr 8 18:32:48 [SEQ 260135] Lab62slot5 kernel: [12582.205697] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 23s! [swapp er/1:0] Apr 8 18:32:48 [SEQ 260136] Lab62slot5 kernel: [12582.208701] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft

[tipc-discussion] Kernel 4.4.0 TIPC: links were bouncing and not stable enough

2016-04-11 Thread GUNA
Jon, Lab resources are very busy now, I will send you the logs once collected. Erik, Thanks for the information about tipcutils. Could I use the tipcutils while the system uses the tipc-config ? Is there any conflicts? -Guna

Re: [tipc-discussion] Kernel 4.4.0 TIPC: links were bouncing and not stable enough

2016-04-08 Thread GUNA
I have merged the fixes listed below into 4.4.0 kernel and rebuilt tipc module. Now, the links are look stable. However, I do still see following alarms: 1. "Name table mismatch ..." alarm 2. "Dropping Name Table update" Questions: 1. I thought the fix will resolve the above errors but they are

Re: [tipc-discussion] Kernel 4.4.0 TIPC: links were bouncing and not stable enough

2016-04-07 Thread GUNA
one ... 17097678 3201 3201<1.1.5:829961004>829961004 cluster 17075168 4 4 <1.1.9:1415618317> 1415618317 cluster 17075168 4 4 <1.1.10:2146874377> 2146874377 cluster There are around 2

[tipc-discussion] list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (ffff88034b1d1c88), but was (null)

2016-03-29 Thread GUNA
Based on Kernel 4.4.0+some of the latest tipc fixes. The card is not come up, required to re-seat. Also still seeing "Dropping name table..." [ 255.418898] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 110 at lib/list_debug.c:29 __list_add+0x81/0xd0() [ 255.426646] list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev

Re: [tipc-discussion] Kernel 4.4.0 - tipc __list_del_entry

2016-03-29 Thread GUNA
429781] kernel: [ 8289.115539] [] tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe+0x7e/0x110 [tipc] Mar 23 15:13:25 [SEQ 429782] kernel: [ 8289.123059] [] ? handle_edge_irq+0x93/0x150 Mar 23 15:13:25 [SEQ 429783] kernel: [ 8289.128967] [] ? tipc_subscrp_send_event+0xf0/0xf0 [tipc If I miss any fix please let me kn

[tipc-discussion] subscr.c: Added new function is removed on latest: why

2016-03-29 Thread GUNA
scriber); sub->subscriber = subscriber; tipc_nametbl_subscribe(sub); <== At this point, "sub" won't be NULL spin_unlock_bh(>lock); ... Thanks, Guna -- Transfor

[tipc-discussion] Kernel 4.4.0 - tipc __list_del_entry

2016-03-24 Thread GUNA
Please confirm the following will fix the issue reported below: // fix in 4.4.4 https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?h=linux-4.4.y=c57e51ffd1d910d595ccb3af3ae70eeeb6d423a2 Mar 23 15:13:25 [SEQ 429763] kernel: [ 8289.000919] Workqueue: tipc_rcv

[tipc-discussion] TIPC utilities v2.0.2 compatibility with latest Linux Kernel 4.4

2016-01-20 Thread GUNA
tipc.h and tipc_config.h files are located to create new tipc-config based on new Kernel 4.4 ? Thank you, Guna B -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App