This commit series requires the following kernel patch set:
"[PATCH net-next v2 0/5] tipc: netlink updates for neighbour monitor"

v3: - simplified the header layouts in commit#9.
    - updated man pages.

v2: - split patches into self-contained complete commits.
    - address review comments from richard alpe.
    - cleanup of tipc bearer.
    - introduce tipc link monitor summary

Note:
1. I have issues compiling the latest iproute2 package, so compiled
   on commit c13b6b097ab3 "add coverity model file".
2. This series conflicts with:
   "[PATCH iproute2 0/4] introduce bearer get and bearer add".
   needs rebase when submiting to net-next.

regards
Partha

Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan (10):
  tipc: remove dead code
  tipc: introduce cmd_get_unique_bearer_name() function
  tipc: validate bearer arguments early
  tipc: fix bearer operations with media=ib
  tipc: add link monitor set threshold
  tipc: add link monitor get threshold
  tipc: add link monitor summary
  tipc: export some bearer helper functions
  tipc: add link monitor list
  tipc: update man page for link monitor

 include/linux/tipc_netlink.h |  37 ++++
 man/man8/tipc-link.8         | 101 +++++++++++
 tipc/bearer.c                | 412 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 tipc/bearer.h                |   3 +
 tipc/link.c                  | 376 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 744 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.4


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to