Yes, this works for me too, and I see no problem with it.
Acked-by Jon Maloy
Thanks
///jon
On 02/24/2016 11:02 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Jon Maloy wrote:
>> Anybody who has time to look into this?
> So this appears to work for me, do you see any problems with this?
>
> Subject: [-next] ne
Anybody who has time to look into this?
///jon
On 02/19/2016 06:41 PM, Jon Maloy wrote:
> The compatibility functionality has been broken, and causes a crash as
> shown below:
>
> Bisecting seems to indicate that the culprit is:
>
> commit 263ea09084d172cac6e40459a690babe8de8e448
> ("Revert "gen
The compatibility functionality has been broken, and causes a crash as
shown below:
Bisecting seems to indicate that the culprit is:
commit 263ea09084d172cac6e40459a690babe8de8e448
("Revert "genl: Add genlmsg_new_unicast() for unicast message allocation")
///jon
---
