Hi
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Christopher D. Green wrote:
> jim clark wrote:
> > Scientific psychologists should take philosophy and history of
> > science with a real heavy dose of salt (i.e., skepticism). Our
> > scientific practices should be based on a science of science, not
> > philosophy or histo
No, I don't. Are you looking for
it?
Beth
- Original Message -
From:
Jim Matiya
To: Teaching in the Psychological
Sciences
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 8:18
PM
Subject: RE: Harlow article
Hi Beth,
Do you have the article and questions that were posed f
Hi Beth,
Do you have the article and questions that were posed for the Scientific American article about Harlow??
jim
Jim Matiya
Carl Sandburg High School
131st and LaGrange Road
Orland Park, IL 60462
2003 Moffett Memorial (High School Category)
Teaching Excellence Award of the Society for
At 4:49 PM -0500 3/21/04, Stephen Black wrote:
and he says Slater didn't describe the story about
Deborah in a Skinner box as true. He says Slater prefaced it with the
phrase "what we presume to know", and she ended by saying "It all seems,
without a doubt, good intentioned, if not downright no
Allen Esterson said, in reference to my comment that the evidence he cited
supports what is better termed a social, not biological hypothesis:
> lets try again and see how close we can get to agreement. In my view the
> evidence of the studies I cited points to a genetic propensity for
> sibling
I join the ranks of those chagrined at the apparent
mess Lauren Slater made of the Skinner story, but I'm still planning to read
it. (I'll give a book report for TIPS if anyone is interested.) I've
been a fan of her writing, though she does have some rather challenging
ideas. Two of her b
Thanks to Stephen for pointing out the Harlow
article which I enjoyed this morning in the Boston Globe. Clicking on the
URL Stephen was given however, doesn't bring up the wonderful photos
included in the story. A couple of them are the classics we've
probably all seen, but two, including t
Given the critical comments in this thread concerning the veracity of
Laura Slater's book _Opening Skinner's Box_, I thought people might like
to read a sample of her work. The Boston Globe has reprinted an adapted
version of her essay on Harry Harlow at:
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/081/focus
jim clark wrote:
Scientific psychologists should take philosophy and history of
science with a real heavy dose of salt (i.e., skepticism). Our
scientific practices should be based on a science of science, not
philosophy or history (at least the nonempirical variants of
those disciplines), and of c
Hi
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Christopher D. Green wrote:
> characterize it as an "operationalization." "Operational definitions"
> were badly misunderstood and badly distorted by the behavioral
> psychologists who picked them up from physics in the first place, and
> the "operational attitude" turne
The recycling is a good thing! Now and then, a new idea pops up. I hope
that the "older" members can continue to be active in these discussions with
a role different from librarians.
>-Original Message-
>From: Annette Taylor, Ph. D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>The same old same old gets re
Christine L. Glover wrote:
In many ways, I do see attachment theory as an operationalization of Freud
(our childhood haunts us).
There can be no doubt that Bowby and the "attachment" gang were highly
*influenced* by psychoanalysis -- attachment might even be seen as a
"development" of psychoana
A correction:
Sorry, I made a slip in my last message (no excuses, but it *is* difficult
keeping track of Freuds contradictory assertions). I wrote:
Odder still, although in 1925 he was still asserting that in both cases
[boys and girls] the mother is the original [libidinal] object (1925, SE
Christine Glover wrote:
>In many ways, I do see attachment theory as an operationalization
> of Freud (our childhood haunts us).
Christine, could you please explain what you mean by attachment theory
being an operationalization of Freud.
What Freud uncovered about our childhood, from analysi
14 matches
Mail list logo