This is slightly depressing - it's very lonely in my corner of the world!
Be well,
Bobbie
Dr. Bobbie Turniansky
ACE Program
Kaye College of Education
Beer Sheva, Israel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: FRANTZ, SUE
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Sen
Re placebo vs anti-depressant, shouldn't there be a third group? The group that
gets nothing,not even the placebo?
Michael Sylvester,PhD
Daytona Beach,Florida
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The correspondence below is a thread of TIPs that recently happened. I took
part in it as you can read. Based on this actual exchange, and nothing else, I
have been suspended from my job (with pay --hooray). My college has decided
that I am a possible threat to everyone and I must undergo some e
According to an editorial dated February 28 in _Nature_,
"The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board is considering an
application by the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) to grant online
master's degrees in science education. And an advisory panel to the board
has recommended that Texas s
Are you on the TIPS Subscribers map?
http://flightline.highline.edu/sfrantz/tips/index.htm
If so, are you using Del.icio.us? I can add a link to your Del.icio.us page,
and give you a special icon on the map. See my listing for an example. (Btw,
I'm tagging recommended sites from TIPS with a
I think it is quite consistent. The Jr. doesn't become part of the last name.
In fact, it follows the first and middle initial in the reference list. So, it
wouldn't make sense to reference Smith, Jr. in the text when Smith is actually
listed in the references as the last name.
Rick
Dr. Rick
Blaine Peden wrote:
*Steven*
*Are you talking about use of Jr. when citing or referencing. The
Publication Manual indicates you include the Jr. in the reference
section; however, it does not appear when you cite the name. Is there an
explanation for the inconsistency?*
Yes, poor proofre
Steven
Are you talking about use of Jr. when citing or referencing. The Publication
Manual indicates you include the Jr. in the reference section; however, it does
not appear when you cite the name. Is there an explanation for the
inconsistency?
- Original Message -
From: Steven Spe
There is a special group of Kurdish fighters who take an oath of celibacy as
part of of their revolutionary spirit.
Did Clark Hull say anything about whether a suppression (or inhibition Ir) of
one drive may enhance an increase
in another drive -and in this case- aggression.I am aware that in t
Forgive my slightly "off post" comment.
My students are telling me that they don't TRUST research.
They have seen so much contradictory research described (They don't read the
originals) and their analytical skills are weak.
What conclusions are they to draw?
Depression is the symptom or outcome
Steven,
According to p. 224 of the 5th edition of the APA Publication Manual,
the bibliographical reference would be:
Smith, J.E., Jr.
Julie
Julie A. Penley, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psychology
El Paso Community College
PO Box 20500
El Paso, TX 79998-0500
Office phone: (
An interesting discussion of the antidepressant paper and the media coverage
(and the wider implications of treatment testing) is at the Bad Science web
site:
http://www.badscience.net/?p=619#more-619
Jeff Nagelbush
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ferris State University
_
Allen Esterson wrote:
I fear that this is going to be a lengthy posting,...
And it was, but I think the critical move was here:
It is certainly the case, as Chris writes, that trials with significant
results are more likely to be published than those with negative or neutral
results, and this a
I am assuming that someone on the list can provide "definitive"
information about this one. What is the appropriate APA format for
referencing a "Jr.". For example: John E. Smith, Jr.
Steven M. Specht, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psycho
In a thread initiated, as they often are, by the eclectic Michael S., we
discussed whether Darwin had a speech impediment. I found a website
(http://www.aboutdarwin.com/darwin/WhoWas.html )
which said he did, consisting of a slight stutter on the first word of a
sentence, particularly words begi
On 26 February 2008 Chris Green wrote:
>Allen,
>Seriously. These two articles are ancient history now. With the recent
>revelations that the published body of articles is itself a highly
>biased sample of the research that has actually been conducted
>(essentially, if you didn't get a positive
16 matches
Mail list logo
