Maybe lectures aren't so bad after all, says this writer. Maybe they are
better pitched (than discussion) at the typical level of student reading
abilities.
http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/11/20/kotsko
Chris
--
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON
Here's what I guess he might have twittered one lazy afternoon:
giv me 12 infants & my own wrld 2 bring them up in I'll take 1 at
random & train him 2 be dr, lawyr, rtist, merchant-chief, beggar or
thief.
Michael
Michael Britt
mich...@thepsychfiles.com
www.thepsychfiles.com
---
To mak
How about this one:
If Freud twittered: The gr8 question Iv not bn able 2 answer, despite
my 30yrs of research in2 the feminine soul: 'What does a woman wnt?'"
Michael
Michael Britt
mich...@thepsychfiles.com
www.thepsychfiles.com
twitter: mbritt
---
To make changes to your subscription c
i m not n e d ot. u r.
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)
Any finally, because it's Friday and my brain is burnt out, here's
what I believe Ebbinghaus might have tweeted:
Psychology has a long past, but only a short history.
Of course, he would have wanted to make sure that the tweet was found
if anyone searched twitter for anything relating to psy
Of course, this doesn't include the follow up statement that most people
don't know about"Of course, I'm exaggerating".
**
Tracy E. Zinn, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
MSC 7704
Miller Hall Room 1171 (Lab room 1209)
Department of Psychology
James Mad
But of course this means that the ideal (live) lecture is too far
ahead fo half the students and too far behind for the other half.
On Nov 20, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Christopher D. Green wrote:
>
>
>
> Maybe lectures aren't so bad after all, says this writer. Maybe
> they are better pitched (than
Forgot who requested it, but believe someone asked about a brief but real
article that used meta-analysis a few days ago. Just off the press in
"Perspectives on psychological science" vol 4 (6), p. 578 - 586 is Lac &
Crano's "Monitoring Matters" that looked at 17 studies, all on parental
monit
Rosalie, u r 4 me!
Chris Green
=
Tracy Zinn wrote:
Of course, this doesn't include the follow up statement that most people
don't know about"Of course, I'm exaggerating".
**
Tracy E. Zinn, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
MSC 7704
Mille
sbl...@ubishops.ca wrote:
For IQ, the figure for heritability is generally found to be higher,
typically in the 0.70 range, although there is a wide range of
estimates. In school-aged children, while they are still at home, the
figure is lower, and there is a clear shared environment effect.
Would this be a meta-analysis of nothing but flawed studies of the impact of
parents on adolescent behaviors that don't take into account the impact of
genetics? Or are these not studies of behavioral effects conducted within the
last 20 years?
Rick
Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
Division of Humanitie
On 20 Nov 2009 at 17:40, Rick Froman wrote, in relation to Lae
and Crano's (2009) meta-analysis of parental monitoring of
marijuana use:
> Would this be a meta-analysis of nothing but flawed studies
> of the impact of parents on adolescent behaviors
> that don't take into account the impact of g
Thanks for that, Chris. I LOVED it. My favorite part was
"...and unless we want to cultivate students who believe that their every
utterance is intrinsically worthwhile due to their precious snowflake-hood, it
would probably be good to get them to a point where their confidence is earned,
w
13 matches
Mail list logo
