bits, you won't catch even one]Russian proverb.
> -Original Message-
> From: Allen Esterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:52 PM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
> Subject: Re: "poor test-Makers?"
>
> Paul
Title: Re: "poor
test-Makers?"
At 3:51 PM -0500 3/12/04, Allen Esterson wrote:
Paul Brandon wrote:
> I'd question whether the difference
in capability is necessarily
_innate_.
> To respond to one personal anecdote with another:
> I'm an engineering dropout. I'v
Paul Brandon wrote:
>> Allen Esterson wrote:
> >The idea that such accomplishments have any bearing on the intellectual
> >abilities required to master advanced maths or physics does not bear
> >serious consideration. Let me say (with all due modesty!) that I did
> >exceptionally well at school in
At 5:25 AM -0500 3/12/04, Allen Esterson wrote:
You write that your point is proved by the fact that many studies have
shown that girls outperform males in math and science until Jr. high. This
is where we get to discuss the issue in its correct form. The position is
that women are relatively less
Herb Coleman wrote, in response to my asking whether the capacity to grasp
applications of the calculus, Maxwells electromagnetic equations, or
Schrödingers quantum mechanics wave equation, is just a matter students
having been challenged in this way all their lives and have learned how
to play
Subject: Re: "poor test-Makers?"
From: "Allen Esterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:55:12 -0500
X-Message-Number: 1
On 8th March Herb Coleman wrote on the subject of poor test-takers:
I'm really disappointed at the lack of scientific rigor bei
ude for grasping the concepts
involved in these subjects. But if this is the case in such subjects, then
surely it must be the case in the psychological sciences, especially in
those parts of the course that involve, e.g., statistical analysis.
Allen Esterson
Former lecturer, Science Department
South
ntro to Neuropsychology; Child
Development; Physiological Psychology; Psychology and Cinema
-Original Message-
From: Annette Taylor, Ph. D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 9:09 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
Subject: Re: "poor test-Makers?"
> -Original Message-
> From: jim clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 4:55 PM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
> Subject: Re: "poor test-Makers?"
>
.. snip ..
>
> Coincidentally, I have a short article on my desk
Hi
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Annette Taylor, Ph. D. wrote:
> I measured time spent reading the text, time on embedded
> quizzes, time on chapter reviews, time on online quizzes and
> time on all the other pedagogical activities in my intro
> psych text (e.g., critical thinking boxes, online crossword
>
HI Jim:
I'm on another very small list, which I believe grew out of either TIPS or
PsychTeacher. It sort of started out as a consequence of several independent
list members on the main list being interested in textbook pedagogy
evaluation.
One of the things we have recently discussed (althoug
Hi
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Herb Coleman wrote:
> >Subject: Re: "poor test-takers?"
> >From: David Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 11:21:26 -0800
from David I think ...
> > Years ago, I administered a questionnaire on study habits to a
> >large class of intro psyc studen
Subject: Re: "poor test-takers?"
From: David Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 11:21:26 -0800
Miguel Roig wrote:
my bet would be that those who score low on test wiseness tend to
also have poorer study skills and/or to simply not be very motivated
to learn the material.
13 matches
Mail list logo
