Jim Clark:
I hope that Jim is as keen to find flaws in any conclusions based on such
anecdotes as he is to find flaws in actual studies.
Jim Guinee:
Well, I don't follow you...I don't think we should generalize one conversion
story. That doesn't mean it isn't interesting and a worthwhile case
The following reply to Jim Clark's very interesting post is long and if you
have no interest in this topic, (why did you open this message?), I should
remind you that you are voluntarily reading this message and you may stop at
any time with no penalty.
Rick Froman
Psychology Department
John B
Hi
James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15-Jun-06 10:15:37 AM >>>
It has to go without saying (but maybe not) that one guy who is a famous
biologist and also believes in God doesn't say anything about the likelihood of
othe
Title: Re: [tips] Conversions and
Rejections
At 12:26 AM -0400 6/15/06, Jim Guinee wrote:
> Stephen Black:
> But more
> important, Jim has a history of contributing such "innocent"
posts.
Jim Guinee:
As long as I'm being portrayed as the rebellious tipster monk, I'll
add
one:
http://www.times
It has to go without saying (but maybe not) that one guy who is a famous
biologist and also believes in God doesn't say anything about the likelihood of
other biologists being believers or the compatibility of science and religious
belief and a survey of evolutionary biologists' religious belief
Hi
James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14-Jun-06 11:26:03 PM >>>
As long as I'm being portrayed as the rebellious tipster monk, I'll
add
one:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2220484,00.html
Let me say up front,
