Fwd: Academic Fraud/Human Subjects

And here is another article, not sure if the info adds much to the previous one. Annette >>http://www.modbee.com/local/story/7981057p-8852389c.html >><> > Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D. Department of Psychology University of San Die

Re: Human Subjects

into an avalanche. >> >> So, I'd still say that to follow the federal codes is probably a smart >> idea >> >> Annette >> >> Quoting Marie Helweg-Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> The original note from David Daniel does

Re: Human Subjects

obably a smart > idea > > Annette > > Quoting Marie Helweg-Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> The original note from David Daniel does not indicate whether his >> university is receiving federal funding for human subjects research. The >> federal guidel

Re: Human Subjects

e Quoting Marie Helweg-Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The original note from David Daniel does not indicate whether his > university is receiving federal funding for human subjects research. The > federal guidelines (that Annette provides a link to) only have to be > followed I

Re: Human Subjects

Title: Re: Human Subjects On 10/15/02 5:02 PM, "Marie Helweg-Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Perhaps David can expand here: are you asking what the federal guidelines require or are you asking what would be good for a voluntary IRB? The feedback I have received so far r

Re: Human Subjects

The original note from David Daniel does not indicate whether his university is receiving federal funding for human subjects research. The federal guidelines (that Annette provides a link to) only have to be followed IF the university is required to follow federal IRB guidelines which (as I

Re: Human Subjects

d out precisely, including the composition of the committee. And yes, you do need a community member... annette On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, David B. Daniel, Ph.D. wrote: > I think this has been discussed before but: What is the optimal membership > make-up of a human subjects review bo

RE: Human Subjects

/index.htm > -Original Message- > From: David B. Daniel, Ph.D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:21 AM > To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences > Subject: Human Subjects > > > I think this has been discussed before but: What is the opt

Re: Human Subjects

At 08:21 AM 10/15/2002 -0400, you wrote: I think this has been discussed before but:  What is the optimal membership make-up of a human subjects review board? We have a proposal to include a community member, an administrator and several faculty.  Just wondering. I would imagine that the optimal

Re: Human Subjects

Hi On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, David B. Daniel, Ph.D. wrote: > I think this has been discussed before but: What is the > optimal membership make-up of a human subjects review board? > We have a proposal to include a community member, an > administrator and several faculty. Just won

Human Subjects

I think this has been discussed before but: What is the optimal membership make-up of a human subjects review board? We have a proposal to include a community member, an administrator and several faculty. Just wondering. David \\|// (o o) oOOo-(_)-oOOo

Re: Human Subjects Review

eviewed by a "human subjects" review for protection of the students. Do > your institutions typically require review for research of this nature? > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

RE: Human Subjects Review

: Human Subjects Review A business faculty member at our college wants to suvey stuents in classes concerning their perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of having classes taught by adjunct faculty. He has been told that it needs to be reviewed by a "human subjects" review for pro

Re: Human Subjects Review

it by the CPHS or IRB Annette > > Charlotte > > >A business faculty member at our college wants to suvey stuents in > classes > >concerning their perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of > having > >classes taught by adjunct faculty. He has been told th

Re: Human Subjects Review

vantages and disadvantages of > having > classes taught by adjunct faculty. He has been told that it needs to > be > reviewed by a "human subjects" review for protection of the students. > Do > your institutions typically require review for research of this > nature? > &

Re: Human Subjects Review

          To:        "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:        (bcc: David G Thomas/psych/cas/Okstate)         Subject:        Human Subjects Review A business faculty member at our college wants to suvey stuents in classes concerning their per

Re: Human Subjects Review

been told that it needs to be >reviewed by a "human subjects" review for protection of the students. Do >your institutions typically require review for research of this nature? > >--- >You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To unsubscribe s

Re: Human Subjects Review

needs to be >reviewed by a "human subjects" review for protection of the students. Do >your institutions typically require review for research of this nature? > -- === Charlotte F. Manly, Ph.D. Psychol

Human Subjects Review

A business faculty member at our college wants to suvey stuents in classes concerning their perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of having classes taught by adjunct faculty. He has been told that it needs to be reviewed by a "human subjects" review for protection of the st