RE:[tips] An outsider's view of authorship

2009-10-14 Thread Mike Palij
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:58:40 -0400, Scott Lilienfeld wrote: Hi Mike - I think (?) we're saying the same thing. Sort of. What I've tried to do is focus on the different traditions that areas may have which will lead to certain expectations of how to interpret sequence of authors: (1) Rugged

Re: [tips] An outsider's view of authorship

2009-10-13 Thread Michael Smith
I thought that's the way it was in psych---the grad students and post-docs get first authorship and the PI gets the last position. Everyone I know in my area of research works that way. I have heard in some related area where perhaps some 'old school' types always take first authorship, but I

RE:[tips] An outsider's view of authorship

2009-10-13 Thread Marc Carter
I was a little confused by it -- it seemed to be saying that the last author position was the most prestigious in medical research, and he's suggesting that our adopting that would ease the problem that he mentions (the junior scientist having to move her name to last place). But if last

RE: [tips] An outsider's view of authorship

2009-10-13 Thread Bourgeois, Dr. Martin
, where the student should almost always be first, barring unusual circumstances. From: Michael Smith [tipsl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:18 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: Re: [tips] An outsider's view

RE: [tips] An outsider's view of authorship

2009-10-13 Thread Lilienfeld, Scott O
both. - Zen Buddhist text (slightly modified) -Original Message- From: Michael Smith [mailto:tipsl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:18 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: Re: [tips] An outsider's view of authorship I thought that's the way

RE: [tips] An outsider's view of authorship

2009-10-13 Thread taylor
of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park San Diego, CA 92110 619-260-4006 tay...@sandiego.edu Original message Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:24:20 -0400 From: Bourgeois, Dr. Martin mbour...@fgcu.edu Subject: RE: [tips] An outsider's view of authorship To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS

RE: [tips] An outsider's view of authorship

2009-10-13 Thread Mike Palij
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:33:08 -0700, Scott O. Lilienfeld wrote: In my experience, it's a marked minority in academic psychology departments. I know some tenure and promotion committees that either don't count (or count only minimally) articles that aren't first-authored by the candidate in

RE: [tips] An outsider's view of authorship

2009-10-13 Thread Lilienfeld, Scott O
- From: Mike Palij [mailto:m...@nyu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 2:43 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Cc: Mike Palij Subject: RE: [tips] An outsider's view of authorship On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:33:08 -0700, Scott O. Lilienfeld wrote: In my experience, it's a marked minority