Not to mention the risks of being killed by an infected cheeseburger.
We cheerfully tolerate many higher but less dramatic risks than
'terrorism'.
On Dec 29, 2009, at 12:03 AM, Christopher D. Green wrote:
> Here are some statistics on the probability of being the
> (attempted) victim of terro
on [paul.bran...@mnsu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:19 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Stats on airplane terrorism
Not to mention the risks of being killed by an infected cheeseburger.
We cheerfully tolerate many higher but less dramatic risks tha
ightning strikes, as the issues involved here are markedly different.
Scott
From: Paul Brandon [paul.bran...@mnsu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:19 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Stats on airplane terrorism
Not to mention the risks of
, December 29, 2009 1:19 AM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: Re: [tips] Stats on airplane terrorism
>
> Not to mention the risks of being killed by an infected cheeseburger.
> We cheerfully tolerate many higher but less dramatic risks than
>
index.html
-Original Message-
From: Mike Palij [mailto:m...@nyu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4:55 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Cc: Mike Palij
Subject: RE: [tips] Stats on airplane terrorism
I would like to add to Scott's point that terrorism involving com
