Annette- First, I didn't see what you said as rambling at all. Very well said. 
I also would guess that our teaching styles are different and that may well be 
because of several things. Not the least of which is that we teach different 
things in completely different types of institutions. Even greater differences 
may exist in our personal styles. I have no idea why it is true (what I do) but 
my first few years' classroom assessments determined that I came across to some 
students as a bit cold, sometimes sterner than I mean to be, and somewhat 
aloof. So I think I can get away with what might come across to your students 
as weakness while in me it makes me look more "warm and cuddly" or certainly 
more like I care about them (which, in all honesty, I do). I have learned 
thought that what I call "pensive" is sometimes perceived as "distant" by them, 
for example. 

And I wouldn't disagree with you that there have been a couple of students 
along who have taken advantage of it. But for reasons having to do with family 
issues as well as training, I have very strong detectors for that- that is one 
advantage to our College- small classes ( < 25) and a small residential 
atmosphere (around 950 students) means that I can call them in the dorm during 
class or lab and say, "Get yourself to class now or face withdrawal". I've only 
done that twice but both those students came back later and apologized and said 
thank you. I think in a large class at a large University where they never see 
you much beyond class perhaps I would have to adopt some of the same techniques 
as work for you. I was also a performance major (voice) and have a history of 
public performance to fall back on and I have some skills at working and 
winning an audience (though I NEVER try to think of my classes as performances- 
sometimes the ham in me. . .). Anyway, I wanted to say that your perspective on 
this is certainly as valid (and valued, by me) as mine is. I just think trying 
to apply a scheme to fixing a situation without consideration of all those 
variables would be more likely to fail. BTW- I have been told by more than one 
female faculty member that the things I do in class and out would not work for 
them for exactly the reasons you have stated- I don't know enough to know or 
enough about the research to comment much on that but it is certainly plausible 
that plays a role- shouldn't but it may in any number of unfortunate ways.

Tim

_______________________________
Timothy O. Shearon, PhD
Professor and Chair Department of Psychology
The College of Idaho
Caldwell, ID 83605
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

teaching: intro to neuropsychology; psychopharmacology; general; history and 
systems

"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." Dorothy Parker



---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to