To be fair, there was a pretty good discussion.
http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/01/21/News/315507.html
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/24/05 7:16 PM >>>
Does this bill include text books at all levels including college? What
about texts books in anthropology, sociology, etc?
I guess they can't
Does this bill include text books at all levels including college? What about
texts books in anthropology, sociology, etc?
I guess they can't mention that people in other places (say outside Arkansas)
have varied definitions of marriage?! It would be tough to teach world cultures.
Marie
Christop
Michael Scoles wrote:
>We're going to need more stickers.
>http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/ftproot/bills/2005/public/HB1136.pdf
So, apparently, in Arkansas,
one is not allowed to even mention that other jurisdictions define
marriage differently (because that would "include any definition of
mar
We're going to need more stickers.
http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/ftproot/bills/2005/public/HB1136.pdf
Michael T. Scoles, Ph.D.
Interim Chair, Dept. Psychology & Counseling
University of Central Arkansas
Conway, AR 72035
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe
Yep, just did! As I mentioned to Barb Brown who kindly directed me to
that point via the back channel, I still think the points I made are
valid. I am very happy about the results thought. the site did stir me,
and made me react, which ellicits discussion. This is great.
And as the author menti
Frigo, Lenore wrote:
Following links from the page referenced below I came across this page
http://home.comcast.net/%7Evanandel1/index.htm
Go one level deeper, on the "Miscellaneous strategies" link:
The ICS web site is a spoof on fundamentalists' desire t
website I have never
seen the hallmarks of pseudoscience so blatantly and shamelessly laid out.
Maybe next semester's discussion...do I dare?
-Lenore
-Original Message-
From: Claudia Stanny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 9:04 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychologi
Some things are best left unknown.
Dr. Bob Wildlbood
Lecturer in Psychology
Indiana University Kokomo
Kokomo, IN 56904-9003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 24 Jan, 2005, at 12:49, David Campbell wrote:
Rick Froman wrote:
So what's the story? Did David Campbell (the original poster)
conscio
Rick Froman wrote:
So what's the story? Did David Campbell (the original poster)
consciously drop the "r" to pick up the pun or was it a typo? Is he from
a country like Australia where bushfires is the more common terminology?
Actually I received the article from my brother-in-law (who works in
ty
2000 W. University
Siloam Springs, AR 72761
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(479) 524-7295
http://www.jbu.edu/academics/sbs/faculty/rfroman.asp
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Bartel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:49 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
Subject:
For those who might have missed the original set of counter-disclaimer
stickers, check out the printable page of them at the following site:
http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/cpurrin1/textbookdisclaimers/
My apologies if this is a repeat posting to this list - but these were good
enough to share a
those who have much;
it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.
- Franklin Roosevelt
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Bartel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:49 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
Subject: Re: Sci Am on creationism
lin Roosevelt
-Original Message-
From: Robin Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 9:45 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
Subject: Re: Sci Am on creationism
I know Steve Mirsky, and I'll bet you "Bushfires" was no accident.
Paul Brandon <[
ical Sciences
Subject: Re: Sci Am on creationism
I know Steve Mirsky, and I'll bet you "Bushfires" was no accident.
Paul Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 5:40 PM -0800 1/23/05, David Campbell wrote:
An update from Scientific American:
I know Steve Mirsky, and I'll bet you "Bushfires" was no accident. Paul Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 5:40 PM -0800 1/23/05, David Campbell wrote:
An update from Scientific American:Sticker ShockIN THE BEGINNING WAS THE CAUTIONARY ADVISORY BY STEVE MIRSKY
Bushfires
Was the use of this
Title: Re: Sci Am on creationism
At 5:40 PM -0800 1/23/05, David Campbell wrote:
An update from Scientific American:
Sticker Shock
IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE CAUTIONARY ADVISORY BY STEVE MIRSKY
Bushfires
Was the use of this wording deliberate?
are raging all across America over the
teaching
16 matches
Mail list logo
