RE: research ethics questions

2002-04-05 Thread Rod Hetzel
Thank you all for your responses about the research ethics questions. I have pasted them together and forwarded them to my colleague for consideration. Interestingly, a student from another department came to me and said, You don't know me, but I'm doing some research for a class and would

Re: research ethics questions

2002-04-04 Thread jim clark
HI On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (posting for a colleague): Earlier today I received an envelope in my mailbox containing a number of blank surveys and a cover letter requesting my participation in the research project. The researcher is a undergraduate student in an

Re: research ethics questions

2002-04-04 Thread Stephen Black
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jim Clark, responding to Rod Hetzel's ethics question, wrote: If the name of the researcher being withheld was part of the ethics approval, then I would NOT second-guess the review committee. If I understand Jim correctly, he's saying that if the ethics review committee

Re: research ethics questions

2002-04-04 Thread taylor
Being agreeable today, I also agree with Helen Harton, who pointed out that there should nevertheless be information of some kind about whom to contact about the research. This needn't be the bashful student experimenter, but there should be someone identifiable as responsible for

Re: research ethics questions

2002-04-04 Thread George D. Goedel
Title: Re: research ethics questions Annette Taylor commented However, by federal guidelines there MUST BE TWO contact people listed on any consent/instructions and a copy of that information must be made available to each participant in writing! I didn't make up that rule, it's a federal rule

Re: research ethics questions

2002-04-04 Thread George D. Goedel
Thanks Annette. I was not aware that this was in the on-line training module. It certainly is not in the published regs. I wonder if the folks who developed the training models were familiar with the regs. or took some liberties in their interpretation of them. Regardless, it seems silly. If

research ethics questions

2002-04-03 Thread RodHetzel
Greetings: I just got an email from a colleague asking for my guidance in a potentially unethical situation in his department involving research and informed consent. I told him that I would like to submit this question to TIPS and he gave me permission to do so. Please respond to me on

Re: research ethics questions

2002-04-03 Thread Helen C. Harton
The Federal Regs say (see http://www.med.umich.edu/irbmed/FederalDocuments/hhs/HHS45CF R46.html), section 46.116 1. Basic elements of informed consent. Except as provided in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, in seeking informed consent, the following information shall be provided to each