Good reference for birth order effects?

2001-06-23 Thread Miguel Roig
Some days ago someone had asked about references for birth order effects. I thought it might be worthwhile to examine the June/July issue of American Psychologist which has a couple of articles and commentary on the relationship between birth order and intellectual development. A summary line fo

RE: Good reference for birth order effects?

2001-06-11 Thread Charles S . Harris
Matthew Raney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for references on birth order effects on personality. Nancy Melucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied: > Birth order effects are no longer regarded as having any meaningful > long-term effects on personality. I don't have a specific reference, > but the developm

RE: Good reference for birth order effects?

2001-06-08 Thread Dennis Goff
] Subject: Good reference for birth order effects? Hey, all, My class was asking for any good references on birth order effects (including first, middle, youngest and only children) on personality, particularly research in this area, and I was wondering if anyone knew of a good central article/book

Re: Good reference for birth order effects?

2001-06-07 Thread Drnanjo
Birth order effects are no longer regarded as having any meaningful long-term effects on personality. I don't have a specific reference, but the developmental psychology chapter in Kalat's intro textbook outlines the reason why such effects are limited - normally only witnessed in the family se

RE: Good reference for birth order effects?

2001-06-07 Thread Paul Smith
CTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:20 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Good reference for birth order effects?Birth order effects are no longer regarded as having any meaningful long-term effects on personality. I don't have a specific reference, but the developme