Re: morality and religion

2001-04-12 Thread Michael Ofsowitz
. Yes, they would contribute much more. Imagine all the poverty and other social problems we'd have if there were no government programs to prevent them. Poverty is pretty useful in motivating people to give. (It also seems useful in giving us a reason to talk about the relation between morality

RE: morality and religion

2001-04-12 Thread Paul Brandon
At 4:49 PM -0500 4/11/01, Timmerman, Thomas wrote: Paul Brandon wrote: And finally, the volume of social services delivered publically is an order of magnitude greater than that delivered privately. I wonder how these would compare if the publicly-delivered services were funded by passing a

Re: morality and religion

2001-04-11 Thread Dave Myers
At 11:37 AM 04/10/2001 -0400, you wrote: Though it is an unpopular view, I, like Jim Clark, believe religion has no special hold on morality. In case you missed it, here is an interesting article by New York Times science writer Natalie Angier that touches on this issue:

Re: morality and religion

2001-04-11 Thread Drnanjo
Hello, David Myers wrote: But across individuals, religiosity (as indexed by such things as participation in faith communities or self-rated importance of religion) correlates with intentional altruism.  While the correlations between faith and altruism/happiness/health seem pretty well

Re: morality and religion

2001-04-11 Thread Louis_Schmier
You know, I think we have to be careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water. First, there is inherent in all religions a fundamental problem: frail, fallible human beings are being "called" to carry out angelic missions. Second, there is a vast difference between the fundamental

Re: morality and religion

2001-04-11 Thread Jim Guinee
From: Mike Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: morality and religion At 09:34 PM 04/09/2001 -0400, Stuart Vyse wrote: Though it is an unpopular view, I, like Jim Clark, believe religion has no special hold on morality. Indeed, for me morality has always been the domain of philosophy

Re: morality and religion

2001-04-11 Thread Paul Brandon
At 9:27 AM -0400 4/11/01, Dave Myers wrote: This is, indeed, a very stimulating critique of religion. Enough so that, some time after reading it, I penned a response, which, coincidentally, was just distributed electronically today by the University of Chicago's Public Religion project (see

RE: morality and religion

2001-04-11 Thread Timmerman, Thomas
Paul Brandon wrote: And finally, the volume of social services delivered publically is an order of magnitude greater than that delivered privately. I wonder how these would compare if the publicly-delivered services were funded by passing a collection plate or staffed through volunteer hours.

Re: morality and religion

2001-04-10 Thread Mike Lee
At 09:34 PM 04/09/2001 -0400, Stuart Vyse wrote: Though it is an unpopular view, I, like Jim Clark, believe religion has no special hold on morality. Indeed, for me morality has always been the domain of philosophy, but I'll leave the details to Theodore Schick, Jr., Professor of Philosophy at

morality and religion

2001-04-09 Thread Stuart A. Vyse
Though it is an unpopular view, I, like Jim Clark, believe religion has no special hold on morality. In case you missed it, here is an interesting article by New York Times science writer Natalie Angier that touches on this issue: