I have included below Linda Woolf's critique of Jim Clark's
criticisms of religion. I find that most of her critique is
accurate. Science, as a dogma and human practice, has its share of
atrocities, which rival those of religion as a dogma and human
practice. Both science and religion have
Milton Steinberg writes:
I have included below Linda Woolf's critique of Jim Clark's
criticisms of religion. I find that most of her critique is
accurate. ...
However, the God of the major religions that most affect my culture
is supposed to be without flaw. The errors of science are expected as
Hi
Now for the part where Linda and I are not (yet?) in agreement.
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Linda M. Woolf wrote:
Jim Clark wrote:
First, the basis as I mentioned is a commitment to truth and
reason, rather than to a belief in things because our ancestors
say so, because some holy book says
Hi Tipsters,
Jim Clark wrote:
First, the basis as I mentioned is a commitment to truth and
reason, rather than to a belief in things because our ancestors
say so, because some holy book says so, because they make us feel
good, because they allow us to justify our less positive actions,
and
