Re: Re:[tips] Stapel's faking of social psychology data

2011-11-06 Thread michael sylvester
What really is a replication in psychology? This reminds me of the idea of a "pilot study"? See Murray Sidman's Tactics in scientific research. Michael "omnicentric" Sylvester,PhD Daytona Beach,Florida --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here:

RE: Re:[tips] Stapel's faking of social psychology data

2011-11-06 Thread Rick Froman
Allen has provided one more helpful example of replication (even a published lack of replication) in psychological science with the Bulevich et al (2006) study. What seems to be being confounded here is the scientific evaluation of an original finding as opposed to what appears in the popular pr

[tips] Is China funding some U.S psychology grants?

2011-11-06 Thread michael sylvester
If we are to believe Mitt Romney that the U.S has to borrow money from China to fund NEH,NEA, PBS,and others then some psychology grant applications may as well be under a Romney administration's chopping block.So Mike P please wait to see who will be in the White House before submitting your p

Re:[tips] Stapel's faking of social psychology data

2011-11-06 Thread Allen Esterson
Presumably in response to my writing this: > My impression is that this is frequently not the case in psychology, > with results of studies sometimes being widely cited regardless of > whether they have been replicated. Jim Clark provided a justified corrective: >Is replication that uncommon in p

Re:[tips] Stapel's faking of social psychology data

2011-11-06 Thread Allen Esterson
Joan Warmbold writes: >This is fascinating Allen and I, for one, would appreciate knowing >where to locate resources that discuss this requirement of physical >sciences re: important experimental claims need to be replicated >before they are published. Hi, Joan! I fear my wording must have misled