Re: [tips] Explaining science with a few dots and lines

2012-07-31 Thread Paul C Bernhardt
The issues you note are part of the reason that I'm adapting it into a Keynote presentation for my class rather than simply viewing the webpage (with citation of Ms Mayhew's excellent work). I don't want the students to be distracted by the discussion of evolution and I want to deal with the qui

Re: [tips] Explaining science with a few dots and lines

2012-07-31 Thread Jim Clark
Hi I agree that it is very clever and succinct. I have a couple of quibbles ... (I would even say minor quibbles, if that weren't redundant). 1. The circle of Truth should perhaps be labelled Reality? 2. Additional steps would allow the Pentagon (the theory) to become more and more circle-l

Re: [tips] Explaining science with a few dots and lines

2012-07-31 Thread Joan Warmbold
Absolutely wonderful and can be used in such flexible ways. Wow, thanks indeed Chris. Joan jwarm...@oakton.edu > Excellent find Chris! Geez...I wish I was that clever. > > Thanks for sharing bud. > > Michael > > Michael A. Britt, Ph.D. > mich...@thepsychfiles.com > http://www.ThePsychFiles.com

Re: [tips] Explaining science with a few dots and lines

2012-07-31 Thread Michael Britt
Excellent find Chris! Geez...I wish I was that clever. Thanks for sharing bud. Michael Michael A. Britt, Ph.D. mich...@thepsychfiles.com http://www.ThePsychFiles.com Twitter: mbritt On Jul 31, 2012, at 5:50 PM, Christopher Green wrote: > > > > > > > Want to explain how science wo

[tips] Explaining science with a few dots and lines

2012-07-31 Thread Christopher Green
Want to explain how science works to your class? You could make a worse start than this little set of slides, using dots for datapoints and lines for connecting theories. http://www.saramayhew.com/blog/index.php/2012/07/explaining-the-process-of-science-with-a-few-dots/ Chris --- Christopher D.

Re: [tips] Math Is Hard! So, Let's Not Teach It?

2012-07-31 Thread Christopher Green
Marc, I would put it to you that if one cannot look at a mathematical formula and solve for the particular variable one happens to be interested in then one is unable to engage in pretty basic quantitative reasoning; i.e., one is not "numerate." And this is doubly true if one doesn't even know

RE: [tips] Math Is Hard! So, Let's Not Teach It?

2012-07-31 Thread Marc Carter
I think both, Jim. I could never advocate getting rid of it in high school for the very reasons you cite. I was only referring to it as a requirement for the BA/BS. m -- Marc Carter, PhD Associate Professor of Psychology Chair, Department of Behavioral and Health Sciences College of Arts & Sc

RE: [tips] Math Is Hard! So, Let's Not Teach It?

2012-07-31 Thread Michael Palij
Before we go too deeply into Hacker's recommendations, it might be worthwhile to examine what is going on in pre-college math classes. One report that focuses on algebra and uses the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) tests (for more on TIMSS and its relationship to NAE

RE: [tips] Math Is Hard! So, Let's Not Teach It?

2012-07-31 Thread William Scott
I've seen a couple of liberal arts schools go from requiring math courses to requiring a "quantitative" course which is probably in the direction that Marc Carter is suggesting. These curricular changes were for the better but in the examples that I have participated in, the main motivation came

RE: [tips] Math Is Hard! So, Let's Not Teach It?

2012-07-31 Thread Jim Clark
Hi But wasn't Hacker proposing the elimination of algebra prior to university? At what age can kids realistically make an accurate prediction about what they want to be when they grow up so as to know whether to take algebra or not? And how many would not even appreciate all the occupations t

RE: [tips] Math Is Hard! So, Let's Not Teach It?

2012-07-31 Thread Marc Carter
I take your point that Hacker seems to be proposing the misguided notion that things that get in the way of graduation should be eliminated, but do agree with him that algebra isn't something that everyone needs to do. The problem I saw was that he undercuts his argument by saying that physicia

Re: [tips] Math Is Hard! So, Let's Not Teach It?

2012-07-31 Thread Paul Brandon
I think that Michael meant was that we need another challenge from a foreign country to scare us into teaching science. A better answer today might be 'China'. On Jul 31, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Christopher Green wrote: > On 2012-07-31, at 8:18 AM, Michael Scoles wrote: > >> We need another Sputnik.

Re: [tips] Math Is Hard! So, Let's Not Teach It?

2012-07-31 Thread Christopher Green
On 2012-07-31, at 8:18 AM, Michael Scoles wrote: > We need another Sputnik. > We have it. It's called climate change. This time, though, we decided to deny. Chris --- Christopher D. Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Canada chri...@yorku.ca http://www.yorku.ca/

Re: [tips] Math Is Hard! So, Let's Not Teach It?

2012-07-31 Thread Michael Scoles
We need another Sputnik. Michael T. Scoles, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology & Counseling University of Central Arkansas Conway, AR 72035 501-450-5418 --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6