On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:56:16 -0700, Karl L Wuensch wrote:
This procedure uses sound waves, not electrical shocks.
But that's not funny. ;-)
And when you get around to later posts, you'll see that I
acknowledge that it is not electric shocks but sound waves
and suggested some things guys
This procedure uses sound waves, not electrical shocks.
Cheers,
Karl L. Wuensch
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=44972
or send a blank
On Thu, 21 May 2015 09:04:47 -0700, Carol DeVolder wrote:
At the risk of being insensitive, how would one go about
conducting the sham portion of the study? Certainly not
double-blind, but could there be a blind group in this case?
Wouldn't that tend to confound it?
A couple of points in respon
At the risk of being insensitive, how would one go about conducting the
sham portion of the study? Certainly not double-blind, but could there be a
blind group in this case? Wouldn't that tend to confound it?
cd
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Mike Palij wrote:
> The following is a brief arti
The following is a brief article about a presentation made
at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association
(AUA) on May 20, 2015; see:
http://www.firstwordpharma.com/node/1285407?tsid=1#axzz3amtebZZT
Guys, this article is either good news or wince inducing. Or both.
Gals, this article
