Well, three academic streams are confluencing in class this week. First, the students are working on "The Song Thing" project; second, I have due what I angrily call "grrrrrrrrrrrrrr," very unproductive, stress-imposing, mid-term "in progress grades;" and, third, students are journaling to me their answers to my own mid-term "How are we doing so far?" evaluations of their and my performance. Since I am struggling to wean students off of being grade conscious and nurturing a learning consciousness, I am sure that the administrative "powers to be" will not be happy with me since I chose the "none" option for my 180 in-progress grade reports instead of the usual A-F gamut of possibilities. At the same time, you should read the students evaluations. They blew me out of the water. The students had to answer with a word or a short phrase five simple questions:
1. What are three most important things to you that you have learned so far? 2. What are three aspects of the class that have been of the most help to you so far? 3. What are three things you like most about the class? 4. What are three things you wish were different? 5. Have you kept the "A" I gave you on the first day of class? If not, in one or two words or a short phrase, why not. I've been tabulating in a very unscientific way, the student responses. They fall into six positive categories and one negative one. The six positive ones are: (1) they feel that they belong and are connected, and it reduces their debilitating fear and stress levels; (2) they feel a competency they seldom felt before and which surprises them; (3) they feel an autonomy that makes them nervous since they've seldom had it in a class before; (4) they enjoy the ownership of their decisions and control over themselves, which feeds a self-confidence and self-esteem; (5) they understand and accept and appreciate "the why" of the stuff they doing and manner in which they're doing it; (6) and, they're learning some history and experiencing its relevance to their lives. The one negative category of their response reveals the nature of their grade addiction, that is, they wish they didn't have to work so much and so hard to keep their "A." These evaluations give me confidence and reinforce my commitment and determination in my struggle to swim against the current academic reward and punishment, carrot and stick, grading currents by (1) engaging in semester beginning "Getting To Know Ya" exercises that connect students with each other, with me, and me with them; (2) setting up daily, semester-long "stuff" such as journaling and mutual communicating to keep us connected to each other; (3) dividing the class into "communities of mutual support and encouragement" of three and four students that are gender and racially mixed; (4) engaging in semester beginning "Why We're Doing What We're Doing" exercises that explicitly give a purpose and relevance to everything we'll do in class for the entire semester; (5) engaging in crucial exercises that will give the students autonomy and ownership of everything they do; (6) and, implementing my "Academic Oath" by which we--each student and me--work to be aware of, notice, and respect ourselves and others. They, and other elements, are all components of my intention of "Breaking Barriers, Building Bridges, Creating Community." These mid-term evaluations demonstrate that we, students, everyone, all have, as the science is telling us, five needs: first, the need to belong or feel connected; second, the need to feel competent; third, the need for autonomy or self-determination or ownership; fourth, a sense of purpose or meaning in what they, we, do; and finally, the relevant and personal "why" of what we do. When these needs are satisfied, we and they are more motivated, productive, at peace, and happy. When these needs are thwarted, our stress level shoots up, and their and our motivation, productivity, and happiness shoot down. Points, grades, tenure, promotion, salary increases and other academic tangible rewards tend to have a substantially negative effect on intrinsic motivation. When we focus on the short-term goal of a grade or GPA, on tenure or promotion or salary increase, and opt for controlling student's behavior or allowing our behavior to be controlled, we do considerable long-term damage to students and allow others to do considerable long-term damage to us. Think about it. My colleagues don't have the highest morale in these hard time because they've so bought into the carrot and stick syndrome that when we're being furloughed and not getting salary increases, we feel a "what's the use" unappreciated, unnoticed, and an almost "whipping boy" punishment. And, let's not get into the issue of the extent we do sell our souls in a Faustian manner in our quest for tenure and promotion. When we aren't producing, when students aren't producing, they and we typically resort to the carrot and stick of rewards or punishment. We call it grades when it comes to students; we call it assessment or annual review or post-tenure review for tenure, promotion, and salary raises when it comes to us. What few people have done is the boots on the ground, hard work of diagnosing what the real problem is. Thanks to our century long acceptance, implementation, and submission to Frederick Winslow Taylor, we're created creaky, rusty academic factories. But, academic institutions are not factories; we don't have a production line driven by monotonous, mind-dulling, repetitive steps. Yet, we ask the factory question: How can we motivate them? And, we run over the problem with the smoke stack factory answer, "with the reward of a carrot or the punishment of a stick." Our answer is so behind the science that is demonstrating that when people use rewards and punishment to motivate, that's when rewards are most unrewarding and most demodulating. We're deaf to Deci, Boyatzis, Senge, Goleman, Seligman, Amiable, Dweck, Gardner, Csikszentmihaly, and others. The science is telling us that human beings are not rats in a cage or automatons. They're more. They have an innate drive to be autonomous, self-determined, purposeful, achieving, and connected to one another. And when we focus our efforts on creating environments for our innate psychological needs to flourish, when that drive is liberated, people will more likely achieve more and live richer lives. So, the questions we should be asking are: 1. How can we create the conditions within which others will motivate themselves? 2. How can we best liberate the drives for autonomy, self-determination, meaning, and connectedness? 3. What strategies have proven effective to nurture intrinsic motivation in a variety of settings? 4. How do we help each student feel welcome in class? 5. How do we help each student feel she or he belongs and is connected? 6. How do we help each student feel respected? 7. How do we help each student feel she or he is being seen and heard? 8. How do we help each student feel she or he has some control over what transpires in their lives? 9. How do we fixate on the strength to be reinforced rather than on the problem to be solved? Classrooms, campuses, will become "motivating environments" when we stop dictating and controlling, when we stop isolating, when we stop relying on fear-inducing and stress-creating extrinsic rewards and punishment, when we have (1) broken barriers, (2) built bridges, and (3) created community. That is true for students; it is true for faculty; it is true for staff. When our natural human needs to belong and feel connected, to experience a sense of self-determination and ownership, to have meaning and purpose in our lives, to have relevance in what we do, and to have our competencies identified and recognized are met, when we feel we are in community with each other, when we can nurture and reinforce those needs with values that are characterized by respect for oneself and others which are at the core of leading a responsible and ethical lifestyle, we are far more likely to create conditions for everyone to motivate themselves and to achieve. Make it a good day. --Louis-- Louis Schmier http://www.therandomthoughts.com Department of History http://www.therandomthoughts.edublogs.org Valdosta State University Valdosta, Georgia 31698 /\ /\ /\ /\ (229-333-5947) /^\\/ \/ \ /\/\__/\ \/\ / \/ \_ \/ / \/ /\/ \ /\ //\/\/ /\ \__/__/_/\_\ \_/__\ /\"If you want to climb mountains,\ /\ _ / \ don't practice on mole hills" - --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=742 or send a blank email to leave-742-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu