Hi
A good example, perhaps, is Biederman's work on sexing chicks. Supposedly
takes years of practice to do it well, but Biederman's analysis allowed
undergraduates (if I'm remembering correctly) to learn in a few hours ... he
had identified the relevant perceptual features, something about con
Sciences
College of Arts & Sciences
Baker University
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Joan Warmbold [mailto:jwarm...@oakton.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:32 PM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: RE:[tips] Evidence of Premonitions Disc
Relative to Gladwell's book, Blink, and research on subliminal perception,
an alternative and more scientific explanation for these accurate
predictions could be that they are come from the subjects' implicit
recognition of patterns. Since this implicit processing has not become
conscious (explici
Even easier, click on this link which contains the abstract and links to HTML
and PDF copies of the article:
http://www.frontiersin.org/perception_science/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00390/abstract
-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu
-- Original Message ---
Thu, 25 Oct 2012
I do not have an issue with this since we only exist in the Eternal NOW.
michael
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=21292
or send a blank email to
leave-2
Jessica Utts, one of the authors, is the statistician who has reported other
significant psi effects.
Jim
James M. Clark
Professor & Chair of Psychology
j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca
Room 4L41A
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
Dept of Psychology, U of Winnipeg
515 Portage Ave, Winnipeg, MB
R3B 0R4 CANADA
Hi Don:
You should have access to the original article. "Frontiers" is an
open-source journal. Go to the original story that Ed posted, scroll
towards the bottom, and click on the "Frontiers in ..." link at the bottom.
Ken
--
: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Evidence of Premonitions Discovered in New Study
Unfortunately, I don't have access to the original study, but in reading the
abstract I was surprised to find the following:
p < 2.7 × 10−12 (that should read ten to t
Unfortunately, I don't have access to the original study, but in reading the
abstract I was surprised to find the following:
p < 2.7 × 10−12 (that should read ten to the minus twelfth)
Are they really saying that they got a p value of 0.00027 ? Or, am I
missing something?
-Don.
-
Key quote: "Mossbridge said that researchers are not sure whether people are
really sensing the future..."
You sure wouldn't get much sense of that from reading the story.
We're doomed.
--
Marc Carter, PhD
Associate Professor of Psychology
Chair, Department of Behavioral and Health Sciences
Col
10 matches
Mail list logo
