On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:45:53 -0700, Jim Clark wrote:
>Hi
>The supplement to the PNAS article can be found at
>http://www.pnas.org/content/suppl/2010/06/03/1000690107.DCSupplemental/sapp.pdf
>
Many thanks to Jim for pointing out the supplement which makes
a number of points in the article cleare
Hi
The supplement to the PNAS article can be found at
http://www.pnas.org/content/suppl/2010/06/03/1000690107.DCSupplemental/sapp.pdf
Figures s5 and following show clearly the pattern, including the replication.
Findings were partly replicated in sense that both studies show effect of
murder
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:11:28 -0700, Scott O Lilienfeld wrote:
>Hi Mike et al. - Mike, thanks for the helpful clarification. I have to
>confess that I was initially confused by your message until I later
>realized that you we referring not to the press story described in
>David Hogberg's message
Scott's concern is similar to a running argument that a colleague
and I have had for a long time on the importance of main effects
vs. interaction effects. He maintains that interaction effects
are more important because they show differential effects and
what we are interested in are variab
_
From: Mike Palij [m...@nyu.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 8:44 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Cc: Mike Palij
Subject: RE: [tips] a recent corr/causation example
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:16:07 -0700, Scott O Lilienfeld wrote:
>This study, which I have
To me description or analysis of data is one thing but explanation is quite
another.I will not argue with the statistical analysis(main,simple,and
interactional effects).Seems relable so far but
as to validity of constructs more information is needed.I do not buy
the witness to violence and co
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:16:07 -0700, Scott O Lilienfeld wrote:
>This study, which I haven't read, raises another question (in addition to the
does detecting an effect in one group (e.g., African-Americans) but not
>another
>(e.g., Hispanics) constitute a legitimate statistical interaction vs. a f
2010 6:15 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] a recent corr/causation example
This study, which I haven’t read, raises another question (in addition to the
correlation-causation question) that I always find interesting to ponder…when
does detecting a
_
From: Lilienfeld, Scott O [slil...@emory.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 6:15 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] a recent corr/causation example
This study, which I haven’t read, raises another question (in addition to the
correlation-causation questi
nterested in hearing what others have to say.
-Don.
- Original Message -
From: "Lilienfeld, Scott O"
Date: Monday, June 14, 2010 3:16 pm
Subject: RE: [tips] a recent corr/causation example
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)"
> This study, w
This study, which I haven't read, raises another question (in addition to the
correlation-causation question) that I always find interesting to ponder...when
does detecting an effect in one group (e.g., African-Americans) but not another
(e.g., Hispanics) constitute a legitimate statistical inte
11 matches
Mail list logo
