Re:[tips] The Neuro Times: Dogmas in Neuroscience and Further Thoughts on the Limits of Neurohistory

2012-01-18 Thread Allen Esterson
Re the blog article cited by Chris Green: http://www.dictionaryofneurology.com/2012/01/dogmas-in-neuroscience-and-further.html ever wonder where we got the idea that humans have about 100 billion neurons?. Thanks Chris, I never knew that. :-) From the article: Sweeping histories, grand

re: [tips] The Neuro Times: Dogmas in Neuroscience and Further Thoughts on the Limits of Neurohistory

2012-01-17 Thread Michael Palij
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:03:46 -0800, Christopher D. Green wrote: While we like to ponder the origin of psychological fallacies (like using only 10% of our brains), there are many others that we probably continue to espouse, but do not recognize. Are you saying that the assertion that are 100

re: [tips] The Neuro Times: Dogmas in Neuroscience and Further Thoughts on the Limits of Neurohistory

2012-01-17 Thread Joan Warmbold
Then again, perhaps this is much ado about nothing. Consider the following case that was described in the journal The Lancet and imagine how many neurons are involved here? http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2807%2961127-1/fulltext I love this short article

re: [tips] The Neuro Times: Dogmas in Neuroscience and Further Thoughts on the Limits of Neurohistory

2012-01-17 Thread Michael Palij
Just a brief update. I believe that when I took physiological psych circa 1973 we used Richard Thompson's 1967 Foundations of Physiological Psychology which turns out be available in snippet view on books.google.com. On page 1, Thompson says that there are 12 billion nerve cells in the brain.