Very clever! Thanks!
Mick O'Donnell wrote:
>
> Much simpler, and closer to the original posters intention.
> Replace your up_and_down function with:
>
> def up_and_down(*buttons):
>
> for i in range(len(buttons)-1):
> buttons[i].bind("", lambda e, x=buttons[i+1]: x.focus_set())
>
> f
Hi,
Thus spoketh daniel.sc...@srnl.doe.gov
unto us on Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:48:09 -0400:
> I've tested Python2.7 and it exhibits the same problems so it must not
> ship with a new enough version of Tcl either.
As far as I see, Python2.7 still comes with Tk8.5.2 .
>
> What are my options? If I'
Thus spoketh "Michael O'Donnell"
unto us on Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:43:57 +0200:
> Much simpler, and closer to the original posters intention.
> Replace your up_and_down function with:
>
> def up_and_down(*buttons):
>
> for i in range(len(buttons)-1):
> buttons[i].bind("", lambda e, x=button
I've tested Python2.7 and it exhibits the same problems so it must not
ship with a new enough version of Tcl either.
What are my options? If I'm not mistaken I can't just swap the version of
Tcl used by Python, but building Python from source (on windows) seems
like a headache. Is it possible t
Much simpler, and closer to the original posters intention.
Replace your up_and_down function with:
def up_and_down(*buttons):
for i in range(len(buttons)-1):
buttons[i].bind("", lambda e, x=buttons[i+1]: x.focus_set())
for i in range(1, len(buttons)):
buttons[i].bind("", lambda e, x
Hi,
Thus spoketh daniel.sc...@srnl.doe.gov
unto us on Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:57:48 -0400:
> I wanted to do this instead of using the Tcl from ActiveState but
> couldn't find a tclsh or wish executable in Python's Tcl install. How
> would I run code using Python's Tcl distribution?
>
I don't use w
Thank you guys! I know what's wrong now! :)
Michael Lange wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thus spoketh Firat Ozgul
> unto us on Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:19:03 +0300:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> for loop doesn't work, because in a for loop all events will be bound
>> all at once, and you will only see the effect of t
Hi,
Thus spoketh Firat Ozgul
unto us on Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:19:03 +0300:
> Hello,
>
> for loop doesn't work, because in a for loop all events will be bound
> all at once, and you will only see the effect of the last binding. You
> need something that binds events one by one.
>
> If I were you
Hello,
for loop doesn't work, because in a for loop all events will be bound all at
once, and you will only see the effect of the last binding. You need
something that binds events one by one.
If I were you, I would use the next() method of Python iterators:
http://paste-it.net/public/pe0b871/
