Hi Bob,
You really should look at the ttk stuff, it’s the easiest migration path to
quite decent looking GUI’s. As you note, the “classic” widgets haven’t changed
at all in decades. So without the (minimal) API changes to use the ttk widgets,
you’re stuck in the deep past. (Also, please ignore
> On 2019-11-13, at 10:16, Mike Barnett wrote:
>
> O….. on a Mac… yea, not a good combination with tkinter from my
> experience.
It works great if you compile your own Python and link to an included standard
Tcl/Tk. We've been doing that since we started using Macs. 12, 15 years? It
loo
Hi!
I saw that, but didn't take a look at it. Did I even get a choice? Hmm. I'll
look and see if it can handle me. The trigger for all of this was the way
things Tkinter look/feel in macOS. I guess I should give tix/ttk stuff a look,
again, too. Our stuff doesn't need to look native, but consis
So pigs have started sprouting wings and I guess "we" (work) are going to start
shifting to Qt/PySide2/whatever. I've been playing around for a few weeks and
what a mess compared to Tkinter. Does anyone know/think something like Qt-based
classes could be written that are called just like and act
