Hi Zoli, hi Ervin,
Am Wed, 24 Jan 2018 21:34:29 +0100
schrieb Ervin Hegedüs :
> Hi Zoli,
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:19:45PM +0100, Csahok Zoltan wrote:
> > Hi Ervin, hi Tom,
> >
> > Thanks for your replies. So, if there are no further objections
> > then I put making hamlib mandatory on the
Hi Zoli,
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:19:45PM +0100, Csahok Zoltan wrote:
> Hi Ervin, hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for your replies. So, if there are no further objections
> then I put making hamlib mandatory on the top of my list.
>
> In fact it seems that even xmlrpc is compiled in the packaged versions.
Hi Ervin, hi Tom,
Thanks for your replies. So, if there are no further objections
then I put making hamlib mandatory on the top of my list.
In fact it seems that even xmlrpc is compiled in the packaged versions.
But that I would not touch now.
73,
Zoli
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:47:36PM +0100,
Hi Zoli,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:52:33PM +0100, Csahok Zoltan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently tlf has an optional hamlib support. I guess it's optional due
> to historical reasons: hamlib may have been not always available or unstable
> in the past.
> Now hamlib is the de-facto standard rig control
Hi Zoli,
Am Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:52:33 +0100
schrieb Csahok Zoltan :
> Hi,
>
> Currently tlf has an optional hamlib support. I guess it's optional
> due to historical reasons: hamlib may have been not always available
> or unstable in the past.
There was a second historical reason: In old version
Hi,
Currently tlf has an optional hamlib support. I guess it's optional due
to historical reasons: hamlib may have been not always available or unstable
in the past.
Now hamlib is the de-facto standard rig control library for Linux.
A quick check of official debian tlf packages shows that in all v
