Re: Using a Different Configuration File

2020-02-20 Thread Joop Stakenborg
Maybe the package manager decided to add a shell script to the package called "tlf". This shell script will then call the binary and create the appropriate directories before starting the tlf binary. This would explain the odd behaviour you are seeing. 73 de Joop PG4I Op do 20 feb. 2020 om 03:52

Re: Using a Different Configuration File

2020-02-19 Thread Austin Seraphin, KA3TTT
Hi. Thanks for responding. The AUR has version 1.4.0. Neither solution worked. No matter what it reads the default logcfg. file. Interestingly, installing directly from source solved the problem. I use the first method to have a separate logcfg.dat. Perfect, thanks! Perhaps the package maintainer w

Re: Using a Different Configuration File

2020-02-19 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Hi Austin, I had a look at the Arch repository. From there I think you have a tlf-1.3.0 version. You have two ways to solve your problem: 1. Drop the space between '-f' and the filename, e.g. $ tlf -fqrpfoxhunt.dat 2. Use a separate directory, name the config file there just 'logcfg.dat' and c

Using a Different Configuration File

2020-02-18 Thread Austin Seraphin, KA3TTT
I installed TLF from the Arch User Repository. The first time I ran it, it created ~/tlf, and copied a working file structure into it, including rules, a logcfg.dat, and other files. I successfully edited the logcfg.dat and began using it, but I can't seem to figure out how to use another log file.