LGTM. Can you push this to GitHub?
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 8:35 PM, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
>
> From: Ilari Liusvaara
>
> ---
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:42:14AM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
>> Hi Ilari
>>
>>> - Is this document meant to also include the CFRG signatures
>>> work? The interfaces to fun
Hi Benjamin,
Thank you for your comments. Please see inline.
Best Regards,
Cathy
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:bka...@akamai.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 11:34 PM
> To: Zhouqian (Cathy); tls@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [TLS] FW: New Version Notification for
>
From: Ilari Liusvaara
---
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:42:14AM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Hi Ilari
>
> > - Is this document meant to also include the CFRG signatures
> > work? The interfaces to functions are already known.
>
> That is the intention. A PR is welcome.
Well, here's an attempt at a pat
On 10/20/2015 01:38 AM, Zhouqian (Cathy) wrote:
> Dear all,
> This is a new document we have submitted on the TLS extension for server
> redirect. It aims to solve the problems in some applications, e.g., HTTPS
> redirect.
> The "Hello Extensions" message is extended and a new TLS handshake pack
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 10:42 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>
>
>> - In public key validation, X448 resists invalid point attacks
>> the same way as X25519 (of course, all bits of X448 public
>> keys can be nonzero, as the value can get to almost 256^56).
>> - The document still does have restrictions on al
Hi Ilari
> On 19 Oct 2015, at 8:14 PM, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:58:52PM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I’ve submitted version -04 of this draft, incorporating the new curves
>> Curve25519 and Curve448.
>>
>> I’m sorry to say that I have made the merge far too
